How to write the conclusion of the experimental report
Part a introduction; B outline; Research background and significance; D. research methods and perspectives; E. research objects and methods; The second part is the research results; B. research content and main results; C. discussion and understanding; D. current situation and problems; Analyze and discuss the conclusion of the third part; B. conclusions and recommendations; C. research conclusions and explanations; D. suggestions and prospects; E. Problems and countermeasures; 1. The significance of writing research reports and papers is: 1, a faithful record of researchers' ideological development, and a symbol of the research level and value of the subject. 3, an important form of academic exchange and promotion of scientific research achievements. (through time and space) 4. Once again, it is an important practical activity to deepen original research results, improve one's research level and develop one's research ability. Type and structure of research report (1) Type 1, empirical research report 2, literature research report 3, theoretical research report (2) Structure title, signature, executive summary and keywords, preface, text, conclusion, notes and references, appendix 1, empirical research report: such as education investigation report and experimental report. Mainly use facts to explain the problem, the materials strive to be specific and typical, informative and reliable, and the format is standardized. This kind of report requires the introduction and analysis of relevant information, data and typical cases, summing up experience, finding out laws, pointing out problems and making suggestions. This kind of research report pays attention to both theory and practice, and is often related to contact research methods. 2. Literature research report: mainly using literature as research materials, non-contact research methods as the main content, textual research, analysis, comparison and synthesis of literature as the main content, focusing on the information, progress and trend of a certain aspect of education, and commenting and summarizing articles as the main forms of expression. Generally used in educational history and literature review research. 3. Theoretical research report: a narrow paper. The main content is to explain the theoretical understanding of a certain thing and a certain problem, focusing on the nature and regularity of the research object. Unique views, novel opinions, profound philosophy, strict logic and personalized language style are its inherent characteristics. There is no empirical research process in theoretical research reports, so there are higher requirements for researchers' logical analysis ability and thinking level, as well as higher professional theoretical literacy. There are three basic elements in the paper: first, the topic, that is, the proposition and viewpoint whose authenticity will be verified (demonstrated). The main source of the paper is the hypothesis put forward by the research topic and the result of the hypothesis verification by the research. Finally, the paper is to demonstrate the authenticity of the topic and put forward a clear argument. The second is the argument, that is, the basis to prove the authenticity of the topic. The source of the argument should be reliable and effective factual materials obtained in the research process, including qualitative and quantitative materials. The third is argumentation, that is, the discussion process of proving the topic with arguments. Argumentative writing is a comprehensive reflection of the article's structural level, the logic and rigor of material organization, the correctness, scientificity and profundity of the article's thought, and the accuracy, effectiveness and skill of language expression. The paper is different from the empirical research report. It generally extracts the most important, wonderful and creative contents and achievements in scientific research and expresses them in concise and clear language. The paper does not include too many specific research methods and processes, but emphasizes the innovation and academic value of the content. The results of any research topic can be expressed in papers. Three. Writing content and requirements (1) Title 1, content type, orientation and function of title 2. Writing requires accurate titles, novel titles and concise titles (2) Department name 1, signature method, collective signature and individual signature 2. Contribution of signature rules: put forward research ideas, undertake research work and solve key problems. Convention (3) executive summary and keywords (4) preface (3) executive summary keywords 1, executive summary: central content, structure, main arguments and comments; The requirements are focused, concise and clear, generally without the first person, 200-300 words is appropriate. Academic papers should not exceed 1000 words, and relevant publications should have Chinese and English abstracts. 2. Keywords: must be standardized scientific terminology. Generally, each article has 3 to 5 keywords (keywords). Belongs to the pillar concept. (4) Preface 1, content: the origin of the problem; Literature review: definition of theme (explanation of conceptual terms) and statement of problems; Theoretical and practical significance of the research. 2. Writing requirements: the topic should be clearly and accurately stated and the center should be prominent; Evaluate other people's research results objectively, fairly, scientifically and accurately; Briefly introduce the motivation and significance of the research. (V) Text 1, content: It is necessary to comprehensively expound and demonstrate the contents and methods of the research, comprehensively and systematically sort out and analyze the data obtained in the research process, and put forward arguments, analytical arguments and arguments through charts, statistical results and documents, or through vertical development process or horizontal category analysis. The research report is divided into: 1, research object and method 2, research content and hypothesis 3, research steps and process 4, analysis and discussion of research results: the key part of the research report. A. qualitative and quantitative analysis of the results, B. discussion of the research results. Results The reasons for the lack of analysis and discussion materials are that the research design lacks a systematic view, the discussion ideas are narrow, the operation process is not in place, the operation measures are not implemented enough, and people can't have a deep feeling and experience, and they don't know much about other people's research. The discussion of our own results lacks objectivity and support, the measurement methods and means are difficult to determine, and the requirements for data processing and analysis are difficult to choose. The analysis and discussion of the results need the theoretical literacy and insight of researchers, and it is impossible to put forward the development direction for the next research. If you are satisfied, please adopt it and rate it as 5 stars.