After receiving the rejection, if the author does not pay attention to it, it is very unlikely that the reviewer can conduct a second review.

Rejection is normal, even for experienced authors. After receiving the rejection notice, you need to thank the magazine for its comments, and then reflect and improve according to the comments.

If it is mentioned in the review comments that "it is not suitable for publication in this journal", it usually means that the theme, research direction or field of the paper does not meet the positioning of this journal.

In this case, the following countermeasures can be considered:

1. Re-select contributors: according to the review opinions, re-find journals or platforms that better match the theme, research direction or field of the paper for submission.

2. Revise the paper: according to the review comments, revise and improve the paper to make it more in line with the requirements of the journal or platform.

3. Complaint: If you think that the review opinions are not completely correct, or you think that your paper has enough academic value, you can complain in journals or platforms and provide more evidence and reasons to support your paper.

No matter which way you take, you need to be calm and patient, carefully analyze the opinions of peer review, and actively communicate with editors of journals or platforms.

Respond according to the following conditions:

First, the review opinions are correct, and there are major errors in the article, which should be revised according to the withdrawal opinions.

Second, some peer review opinions are incorrect, which should be revised according to acceptable suggestions, and at the same time, an explanation letter should be attached to state the unacceptable peer review opinions one by one, because only when the statements are correct and convincing can the editors adopt a compromise attitude.

Third, the evaluation opinions are almost completely wrong, which may be because the evaluation experts and editors failed to understand or well understand the author's original intention. At this time, the author should pay attention to appropriate strategies and try to write to the editor politely and calmly to state the reasons. Of course, the author can also vote for another magazine to get a more fair evaluation of the article.