First, conciseness. Because most readers usually skim through scientific papers, if they think it is helpful to their scientific research, they will read the details of the articles further. Even if readers decide to spend time studying the full text, due to the fast-paced work and living habits of modern society, in most cases they will only use sporadic fragmented time to read. Therefore, in order to attract readers' attention and better convey information to readers, authors should use concise sentences as much as possible when writing scientific papers. Complex and lengthy expressions will not only cover up the core idea of the article, but also waste the reader's time, thus making the reader lose patience.
Second, clear thinking and reasonable logic. Scientific papers are different from prose, poetry, news, official documents and other genres. The purpose of scientific papers is to expound the research viewpoint by describing the experimental content and analyzing the experimental process, and then to convince readers to recognize the experimental results, understand the analysis ideas and agree with the resulting research conclusions. In order to achieve this goal, the sentences and logic of scientific papers must be clear and easy to understand, and only in this way can readers accurately understand the author's point of view. For example, the following sentence: in the field of nanotechnology research, it has potential applications in biomedicine. Nanotechnology has potential applications in biomedicine.
Third, carefully prepare exquisite manuscripts. This point is often ignored by researchers. Readers of scientific and technological writing include not only readers after the publication of articles, but also editors and reviewers of journals. If the author rashly submits the manuscript without fully preparing the data and charts, the reviewers will not be able to objectively judge the study. If you don't fully understand the content of the article, the reviewer is likely to reject it. According to work experience, the editor will think that if the author is careless and perfunctory when preparing the manuscript, then the level of scientific research results he submitted is probably not good, and the experimental operation and data are even questionable. There are too many missing materials in the manuscript submitted by the author, or the chart making is very rough, or even the manuscript typesetting is too hasty, which will lead to the article not being submitted for review and being rejected directly. Therefore, before submitting a manuscript, we must carefully study the submission instructions, carefully prepare the manuscript, try our best to be illustrated and illustrated, and try our best to leave a good first impression on editors and reviewers.