In domestic academic and scientific circles, the establishment and improvement of professional and technical evaluation system has been controversial.
Reading only papers (SCl) makes many professional technicians not undertake or seriously engage in professional work other than their own scientific research, and do not publish papers, especially high-level academic papers. It is really impossible to evaluate a person's academic level. Because patents are divided into three categories: invention, appearance and utility model, only invention patents reflect a certain academic level and pay attention to socialization, so the important role of academic papers in evaluating the professional level of professional and technical personnel can not be denied at any time.
Of course, work strength, professional strength and scientific research strength are the strengths of professionals.
Therefore, in order to avoid the deviation of the evaluation standard system, we should formulate a strength (performance) evaluation system which is weighted by multiple evaluation indicators and comprehensively evaluated according to the actual situation of each business unit.
For outstanding performance in a single project, a single reward mechanism can also be established in combination.
In order to arouse enthusiasm, all units don't have to be the same. Based on the value orientation, adjust the weight coefficient reasonably to form a good atmosphere of fair competition.