During the summer vacation, I carefully read the book How Teachers Write Educational Papers, which benefited me a lot and made me feel something. First, the topic should be appropriate. Whether the topic is appropriate or not is directly related to the value of academic papers and the success of writing. Therefore, the first thing to consider when writing a paper is to ensure that the topic is not problematic. Generally speaking, under the premise of research value, choose a smaller topic. Small and easy to innovate, realistic and well written. Some big topics can be divided into several small topics to make the argument clearer, the content more concentrated and the discussion more profound. Don't always talk about quality education and equalization, but make these grand propositions concrete from the reality of school education and teaching. Secondly, don't pursue perfection, a paper can't exhaust all the problems or solve all the problems in a package. As far as the actual situation of the majority of teachers is concerned, it is difficult for ordinary teachers to concentrate a lot of time and energy on collecting information, researching and writing articles on larger topics. How can we start small and see big? First, teachers should avoid the mentality of quick success and instant benefit when writing papers. Teacher's thesis is not the "high-end" discovery of educational theory, but emphasizes the "terminal" application of educational theory and the innovation of combining practice. We should pay attention to observe and think about our daily education and teaching work, and find research problems from it, because the classroom is the best laboratory for teachers. Teachers should be good at independent thinking, break the rules, not follow others' advice, and not be superstitious about experts. Only in this way can we innovate. Second, the research scope of the topic can be limited, either vertically intercepted or horizontally absorbed. We should choose some small topics to write according to our own educational practice. Second, the argument should be clear. Scientific viewpoint is the soul and commander-in-chief of the paper. If the viewpoint of a paper is wrong and the foundation of argument is unstable, its value is doubtful. There are mainly the following problems in the thesis: the basic viewpoint is wrong, and the whole thesis is untenable; One-sided view, unable to understand the problem objectively, comprehensively and scientifically; The viewpoint is not clear enough, so we need to explain why there are countless hearts; Old-fashioned views, conformity, nothing new; Fuzzy thinking, superficial understanding and lack of depth; Views are inconsistent with materials, and arguments are not harmonious and unified; The views are contradictory and inconsistent. Listing subheadings is of guiding significance to readers' reading and writers' writing. It is suggested that grass-roots teachers should list subheadings first when writing a paper, and write several articles in one paper, so as to know fairly well. Subtitles are better sentences than phrases, and at least secondary titles must be sentences. Because the meaning of the phrase is not clear, writing along with the phrase will digress. Only by listing the subheadings can we ensure that the theme and structure of the article can be tightly buckled in the process of organizing the text. When talking about problems, we must have a good proper limit, have an appropriate limit, and pay attention to avoiding one-sidedness. Don't be absolute and don't overdo it. It is often seen that some articles emphasize the significance or function of the problems and methods to be explained to an inappropriate degree. If we discuss the cultivation of divergent thinking, we will blindly highlight its importance. It seems that only in this way can we cultivate students' creativity and embody advanced educational concepts. At the same time, it belittles others, as if seeking common ground is the opposite, and it is the product of traditional backward educational thought. For example, multimedia teaching exaggerates its function infinitely, as if it has changed the law of teaching. Only in this way can we show the modernization of education. You can't sell yourself short when writing educational papers, and you can't just grasp one or two points without grasping the rest.