Academic Hall believes that most doctoral dissertations have tangible benefits, especially in foreign professional magazines. In order to stand out from the competition of peers, many medical institutions advocate the development idea of paying equal attention to "scientific research" and "clinic". In order to make up for the shortcomings of scientific research, attractive incentives will be set up, such as how much to reward for publishing papers in provincial magazines and how much to reward at the national level, especially for publishing in foreign magazines.

Of course, more doctors publish papers to promote their professional titles. In the hospital, doctors of different levels have different rights, different wages and incomes, and even the registration fee is 369, so the professional title is a hurdle that every doctor can't bypass. There is a saying in the circle that "a thousand operations are not as good as a paper", which shows the importance of the paper. If you want to be promoted to a senior professional title, owning one or two papers from foreign magazines will undoubtedly add a lot of weight.

Some doctors are already chief physicians, professors and researchers, but they are still keen to publish papers considering their "academic status". After the evaluation of professional titles, doctors should make a difference in their own fields, relying on papers. More papers are sent abroad, and they are more likely to become "academic leaders", obtain official positions, or get some "high gold content" scientific research projects, enter academic groups and become "authorities".

In the final analysis, the reason why doctors are keen on publishing papers is driven by interests. But what causes this abnormal situation is the wonderful talent evaluation standard of our competent department. It is precisely because of the help of the government and society that there will be "thesis experts" who can't see a doctor, and there will be quacks who have "equal work" but no long-term skills.