Question 1: How to write the problems existing in the review opinions of master's graduation thesis is conducive to timely adjustment and avoiding major rework. In the research and writing process of graduation thesis, the author's thinking activity is very active. Some unremarkable materials, seemingly irrelevant materials, often produce new associations or new viewpoints after being familiar with and thinking. If you don't write an outline carefully, you will be disturbed by this phenomenon, and you will have to keep writing, rethinking and even overturning what you have written. This not only increases the workload, but also greatly affects the writing mood. The outline of graduation thesis is like the blueprint of the project. As long as you carefully consider the outline before you start writing and spend more time and energy to make it solid, you can form a clear and logical paper framework, thus avoiding a lot of unnecessary rework. In addition, if the students who have just started to write a thesis write their own ideas as an outline first, and then ask others for advice, they can understand them at first sight, and it is easier to put forward some suggestions for revision and supplement, so as to get effective guidance.

Question 2: How to write the evaluation opinions of dissertations? My previous doctoral thesis was written by reviewers according to the abstract in my thesis, so it's OK to refine it. There should be some innovations written by yourself in the self-criticism book. You can refer to it Leonshane (station contact TA) first makes a brief summary of this paper, pointing out its main clues: research purpose, method, significance, innovation and so on. And then point out one or two biggest problems. If the problem is really fatal, it is recommended to modify it for a long time. Your tutor will check it for you after you finish it. If he doesn't study, I suggest you apply for a new tutor. . . Shuoyeb (station contact TA) 1. General evaluation project: the academic value and application value of the innovation achievements of the paper. The paper reflects the author's basic theory and professional level. 2. Comprehensive evaluation of all reviewers' academic comments on the paper (significance of topic selection, innovative achievements of the paper, academic value and application value, rationality and reliability of experimental results and calculated data, etc.). ) ... 3. Problems, deficiencies, opinions or suggestions in the paper. 2.....LBH535 (sTAtion contact ta) audit opinions should be combined point by point. The surface is the general situation, and the point at least reflects whether the reviewer has read the content carefully. At present, many papers are in the first instance, especially in social sciences. The comments are so general that people feel that they have not read them carefully. Qiu Qu _2002 12 (contact TA in the station) suggested to reply, and then simply write some comments. K 1000 1 (in-sTAtion contact ta) There is also an eight-part essay: The thesis shows that * * * has mastered a solid and extensive basic theory and systematic and in-depth professional knowledge in the research field, and has (strong) independent ability to engage in scientific research, and the thesis (innovation) has reached the academic level of doctoral thesis. It is suggested to organize doctoral thesis defense. If there is a prompt in the nono2009 (Station Contact TA) review form, you can write a review opinion according to several items required by the prompt. Songjm 12 (conTAct ta in the station) read the requirements of the first two pages of the evaluation book and write a comment. Is the research question clear, the research goal clear, the method appropriate and the result obvious? Is the workload full and the content substantial? Wait, the best way is to find an old doctoral thesis and copy it down. Stereotyped writing ~ ~

Question 3: How can I write my previous doctoral thesis without the evaluation opinions of my dissertation? The reviewer wrote it according to the abstract in my paper, and it's OK to refine it.

There should be some innovations written by yourself in the self-criticism book. You can refer to it Leonshane (station contact TA) first briefly summarizes this paper and points out its main clues: research purpose, method, significance, innovation and so on. And then point out one or two.

Question 4: How to write the master's thesis "xxxxxxx" of XXX, a graduate student majoring in xxxx in XXXX College, has certain theoretical significance and application value. On the basis of a comprehensive overview of xxxxxxx, combined with the current situation of xxxx in China, this paper creatively puts forward its own ideas and viewpoints.

The experimental design of this paper is reasonable, the method is appropriate, the writing idea of the paper is clear, the logic is rigorous, the information is informative, the viewpoint is clear, the language is fluent, the argument is strong and the format is correct. The experimental results are analyzed for the first time, and XXXXXXXXX and its mechanism are preliminarily studied, which lays the foundation for further study of XXXXXXXXX and has potential application value.

The paper shows that the author has a solid basic theory and systematic professional knowledge in this discipline, and has the ability to engage in scientific research in this discipline. Xxx's thesis has reached the theoretical level of master's degree, so it is suggested to reply to the master's thesis and grant XXX a master's degree.

Question 5: How to write the shortcomings in the comments of master's thesis? The shortcomings are mainly elaborated from the sideline of your paper. Carefully explaining the shortcomings of the core part of the paper can reflect some aspects that can be expanded in the future, which is equivalent to the shortcomings; Secondly, the innovative part and the insufficient part cannot overlap, so your innovation is of little significance. How to write inadequately depends on the subject paper itself. These are my two little experiences to share with you.

Question 6: How do reviewers write academic comments on graduate papers? Argumentative writing is an expression in which the author analyzes, comments and persuades objective things to show his views, opinions and attitudes. It usually consists of three parts: arguments, arguments and arguments. Argumentative topics are divided into topics, arguments and implications. The topic type is the author's point of view but concise, and the central argument cannot be copied directly. Argumentative and argumentative types generally have no opinion tendency, for example, a friendship between gentlemen is as light as water. Implication generally coexists with the theme argument and cannot be directly used as the central argument to restore the original intention.

Question 7: Do the comments on the master's degree thesis need to be sent to students to revise the thesis? Comments on master's degree thesis are generally divided into the following four conclusions:

1, agreeing to submit a defense;

2. Submit a reply after revision;

3. Revise and resubmit for review;

4. Disagree with the submission of the defense.

In the second and third cases, students need to be sent to revise their papers.

Question 8: How to write the review comments for graduation thesis?

Summary of graduation thesis

Comment on graduation thesis

Summary of graduation thesis

Question 9: How many points can the evaluation opinions of master's graduation thesis pass the defense, that is, more than 60 points?

Question 10: how to fill in the response form for the revision of master's degree thesis, which can reflect the author's overall thinking? Outline is a kind of logic diagram composed of sequence codes and words, and it is a writing design diagram to help the author consider the logic of the whole article. Its advantage lies in that it is convenient for the author to grasp the overall situation of the paper structure, with clear levels, clear focus, conciseness and clarity at a glance. [2]

Second, it is conducive to the echo of the paper. Having an outline can help us to establish the concept of the whole, and test the status and functions of each part from the perspective of the whole, whether there is a logical connection between them, whether the space occupied by each part is commensurate with its status and functions in the overall situation, whether the proportion between each part is appropriate and harmonious, whether every word, sentence, paragraph and part is needed by the overall situation, and whether it is coherent and coordinated into a whole. After such consideration and writing, the structure of the paper can be unified and complete, and it can serve the content of the paper well.