This is a cliche, unpretentious, but this phenomenon is very common.
Plagiarism does not mean that all original works cannot be plagiarized, but inherited, absorbed and used for reference.
Replication is divided into three realms. Copy its text, copy its meaning, copy its potential.
Copying refers to seeing beautiful sentences in other people's articles and using them in your own writing.
Copying its meaning refers to understanding the artistic conception that the author wants to express after reading an article deeply and painstakingly, and expressing it in his own way.
Actually, I don't quite understand plagiarism either. It depends on whether you understand.
I saw an article writing a manuscript in the newspaper before. I don't quite agree. What remains intact is plagiarism.
But if you learn from other people's articles, you have your own ideas. Is this still true?
Since ancient times, all masters have absorbed the knowledge of a hundred schools before they can walk out of their own way.
There are many popular online novels, such as infinite flow, Red Willow, Kung Fu and so on. There are many schools.
The originator of infinite flow's pioneering work is infinite terror, the originator of Red Yellow Willow is based on Buddhism, and the originator of martial arts is the romance of dragons and snakes.
However, a genre cannot be supported by a single book, and there are many works that follow the trend.
Is everything except infinite horror in infinite flow plagiarized? It's just a reference at most! Just add your own ideas to the article, have your own things and create new values.