Let's see what he used, what rhetoric, and whether it was appropriate. Can he write the argument simply and clearly, use it well, whether the argument he used is appropriate and whether the final conclusion is correct? Whether innovative methods are used or not is still the same.

Please refer to:

Narrative class

Elegant and elegant words, vivid scenery. The layout is novel and the text is concise. Detailed explanation, clear and gratifying. Write a landscape and get down to business. Clear organization, rigorous structure, free and easy, interesting and meaningful. Light and far away, relaxed, meaningful and subtle. Plain and straightforward, and romantic. Concise and fluent, with profound implications. Far-reaching and far-reaching, different from many tastes, vivid description. The content is tortuous and intriguing. Interesting, very enjoyable to read. The story is compact and gripping. Fluent and tactful, true and true, rich in content and fluent in writing. Your leisurely travel and delicate description. Tell the truth and speak freely. The words are calm and elegant. Narrative lyricism, are quite appropriate to write a beautiful and vivid scenery. Smooth layout and realistic description. Many words are redundant and the words are not vivid. The content is poor and there are too many typos. It's too early to finish, and it's not enough to write vigorously and unconventional. The article is full of emotion and touching. Detailed description and good organization. Every word, flowing. Exquisite, lifelike, extraordinary, can fly. The meaning between the lines is calm and elegant. Fresh, smooth and natural. Rich in materials and vivid in words. Quite humorous, relaxed style, natural and smooth, methodical.

Lyric class

Bright and fresh, quite charming. Smooth and appropriate, wonderful description. Narrative lyricism is quite appropriate. Incisively and vividly, quite to the point. The structure is complete, fresh and meaningful, and the pen is smart and poetic. Anger flows in calligraphy. The meaning is wide and the realm is halal. The wording is elegant and comprehensive. Speak freely, the words are clear, cheerful and magnificent. Easy and interesting, quite interesting. The words are magnificent and the delivery is gratifying. The writing is sophisticated and thoughtful. Lyric and sincere, the words are used in one go, and the artistic conception is good. Emotional and interesting events. The true feelings are revealed and touching. Wen Chang is big and bears haunt it. Speech is blunt, meaning is unclear, and language is unclear. This sentence is rough and doesn't express the meaning. Hastiness and bias are of little significance. The look of happiness shines on the paper. Improper choice of words, unrealistic and wrong metaphor, irrelevant. The language is blunt and fails to convey the meaning. The meaning is empty and the sentence is not fluent.