Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - What is the form of the results (what categories are included in the interpretation of the project results)
What is the form of the results (what categories are included in the interpretation of the project results)
The research results of the project refer to the creative achievements with certain academic significance or practical value obtained by researchers through scientific research activities. However, only the results of the project research can not be concluded, and the project research can only be successfully concluded through the inspection and acceptance of relevant departments. What are the categories of project results? What kind of topics are useful in job evaluation?

1. What are the categories of project achievements?

The research results of the 1. project refer to the creative achievements with certain academic significance or practical value obtained by researchers through scientific research activities. The research results of the project should have new basic characteristics, namely, putting forward new ideas, discovering new facts, making new explanations, presenting new examples and providing new methods. Results must contain items, regardless of the topic size.

2, each project requires that when reporting the project and filling in the project application form, it is necessary to predict the results to be produced, which is one of the criteria for the project organizer to judge whether the project can be completed when the project is completed. There are more than one kind of project results, and different projects present different forms of results. The category of project results is actually the form of showing project results. Commonly used topics include monographs, translation, research papers, research reports, reference books, computer software, etc.

3. There are many forms to present the results of the project, and the ones that are not commonly used are: experience summary report, policy consultation report, typical education case analysis, typical teaching video, educational narrative, literature review, teaching reform practice plan, school-based curriculum implementation plan, officially published teaching materials or compilation, etc. There are many categories of project results, and which categories can be written for the results of a project depends on the relevant provisions of this project.

Second, what kind of project results are commonly used in job evaluation?

There are many research results, but most of them are mainly papers and monographs. These two kinds of academic achievements are objective, and there are systematic grading standards, which are easy to evaluate. Besides being welcomed by the project evaluation teachers, it is also welcomed by the project personnel. After all, these two forms of project results investigation are familiar to everyone.

1, project evaluation

The project itself can be used to evaluate professional titles, so the results of the project can also be used to evaluate posts. Project evaluation needs to look at three aspects: the level of the project, the position of the author's signature, and the proof of the project conclusion. Generally speaking, the higher the title level, the stricter the requirements for the topic. The topic evaluation shall be subject to the municipal topic, and the effectiveness of the author's signature position shall be subject to the evaluation document; As for the completion time of the topic, only the completed topic can be used for job evaluation.

2. Evaluation of monographs

A topic paper refers to an article that shows the research results of a topic. Like other papers, it can be submitted and published in appropriate journals, and it has not been excluded by a professional title unit. In other words, participants can participate in the evaluation of professional titles with academic papers. When evaluating professional titles by papers, professional title units will put forward specific requirements for the number of papers, the specialty of papers, the level of publication, the status of authors, the repetition rate, and the time of publication. , but it will not limit whether the content comes from the subject research.

As the examination of the title of the paper, the paper should take into account two aspects: first, the paper should meet the requirements of the paper results; Second, the paper should meet the requirements of the topic of the review. Therefore, when evaluating the idea of a topic with a useful topic paper, participants must consider whether their topic paper is useful for promotion.

3, subject monograph evaluation

Academic monographs are one of the forms of scientific research achievements, so some topics may need academic monographs. When the conclusion of the project requires the publication of academic monographs or the expected results of the project contain academic monographs, the conclusion of the project requires the publication of academic monographs.

Whether a monograph can get extra points in post evaluation mainly depends on the author's post, the number of words written by the author and the time of publication. Generally speaking, the top four authors of professional title evaluation and approval monographs have requirements on the number of words in the monographs. However, the specific number of words depends on the requirements of the evaluation unit for the monograph, and the publication time is required before the evaluation.