Recently, some media sent reporters to different places to conduct on-the-spot tests, and used the experiential interview of "falling into the street" to see how many people there are and how long it takes to help. Coincidentally, a large-scale social welfare activity sponsored by a unit took to the streets to observe the public's reaction to this situation by diving, and also presented a car to the first person who helped.
This "diving" test may be out of kindness, hoping to encourage more people to do good deeds and make an empirical study of social moral ecology. However, using "falsehood" to test morality and love is not appropriate after all, and it will also bring side effects-in the future, when people face the problem of "helping or not", they will not only doubt whether their good intentions will be wronged, but also doubt whether "this is a test". In this way, there is no doubt that it has added a ladle of muddy water to the moral ecology. Seeing passers-by fall, some well-intentioned people want to help, but they are afraid of becoming "experiments"; Some people didn't want to help, but the idea of "maybe they will get lucky and win the lottery" flashed through their minds and went to help. In this case, how to score the moral standards of passers-by?
"help? Still not helping? " In recent years, people have been discussing this topic constantly. Every time a new related event happens, this "classic problem" will be heated up once. How to treat this problem? The current public opinion is often bipolar: if you don't help, you will destroy yourself; Do me a favor, you are virtuous. Some diving tests are so black and white. That was not the case. If you don't help, you may be afraid to help because you don't know first aid knowledge. Someone fell and was injured, so we can't simply add a comment that "there is no one to help the onlookers". In most cases, the onlookers are not watching the excitement. Some people are anxiously discussing how to rescue them. Someone took out his cell phone and called 120 ambulance. Someone automatically set up a "warning line" around the injured to avoid causing other injuries to those who fell to the ground. Social moral ecology contains people's various concepts, rules and behaviors, which cannot be tested by one or two tests or simple multiple-choice questions of "help or not".
Instead of doing some so-called "love tests", it is better to escort love. At this year's National People's Congress, "help or not" has also become a hot topic for deputies. Some members pointed out that "helping or not" is related to "honesty", "friendliness", "justice" and "rule of law" in the 24-character socialist core values. It is necessary to cultivate and practice socialist core values, form a positive and positive synergy, regard honesty as an important principle of social governance, and promote the establishment and improvement of social credit information system. The deputies also called on public opinion not to follow the trend of speculation, but to pay more attention to the results. If the results are made clear every time, the right and wrong are made clear, and people know that good is rewarded with good and evil with evil, they can build confidence in society. Some deputies commented on "supporting or not" from the legal point of view, pointing out that the law should guide good and curb evil. According to the spirit of civil law, you are not a criminal without help; Help is a sign of high morality, and the law protects you. If you say that the person who helped you hit you, you have to prove it, but the person who helped you doesn't need to prove it. With such encouragement, people's worries will be eliminated.
Lei Feng's spirit of helping others will never go out of fashion. Encourage people to do good deeds and accumulate virtues, and stick to a certain "unchangeable", that is, help others with a pure heart and get happiness from it. However, we should also see that the social environment has changed and our thinking has diversified. In this context, we need to clarify some concepts, improve laws and systems, care for love and protect good deeds.
Question 2: Hello, the debate about whether the old man can be helped when he falls.
I hope the following information is helpful.
Help the old man when he falls.
Debate statement
Dear host, opponent's debater, dear classmates, hello! My argument is yes. Please allow me to further elaborate the meaning of the word "fu" on whether to help or not. The so-called help means helping, supporting, helping and saving lives. If you simply think that helping is to pull people up from the ground, then the understanding is too narrow.
The Chinese nation has a long history of 5,000 years, and it is our traditional virtue to respect the old and love the young. Our view is that the old man fell and the stranger should definitely help him. Why?
First of all, it was the old man who fell. He is not a young man, let alone a young man. Old people have been respected since ancient times. In ancient times, people over 80 years old were free to enter and leave the palace. In the eyes of the emperor, there are two kinds of people who must be respected, one is parents, and the other is the old man in the world. The respect for the elderly in ancient times can be seen. Nowadays, old people don't even help when they fall. Compared with ancient times, what is this not moral decay?
Secondly, there is an old saying: those who cultivate themselves, govern the country and level the world and achieve great things in ancient times are not only superb talents, but also virtues of supporting the elderly and bringing up the young. A person, talented without virtue, trained and used, talented with virtue, promoted and used, talented without virtue, will never be hired! A person doesn't even have the minimum moral quality, how can he rule the country and level the world?
Third, parents and teachers have taught us to respect the elderly and love the young since childhood. In reality, there are countless examples of children helping the elderly. Children are still like this, let alone us adults? The old man fell and refused to help, which violated his parents' words and the teacher's orders. Above is the yellow sky, below is the thick soil, Lang Lang Gan Kun, disrespectful and unfilial. How does he survive in the world? Finally, the reason why we discuss this issue here is because there is a crisis of trust in the current society. The emergence of the crisis of trust directly affects the road to the rejuvenation of our Chinese nation. What should we do at this juncture? Let the crisis of confidence continue to expand and turn a blind eye? Every man is responsible for the rise and fall of the country. For the prosperity of the Chinese nation, everyone shoulders an unshirkable mission. In the face of such national justice, who dares to be indifferent and look on coldly?
Li Kui jy, Lu Shenzhi and other heroes told us with practical actions that we should do it when we should, and rush into Kyushu! My speech is over. Thank you, moderator, other debaters, judges and audience!
Summary of attack and defense
Only after listening to the other debater's debate can we know what an angry argument is, what is eloquent and what is endless. Only after listening to our debater did we know what one mountain is high and one mountain is low. The strong have their own strong hands. Another debater's viewpoint is novel and unique, and his argument is rigorous and impeccable. However, after careful scrutiny, it is not difficult to find that there are many logical errors in the argumentation process of the opposing debater. Because of time, I can only pick out three places to discuss.
One of the logical mistakes is that the understanding of the master is too narrow. Another debater just mentioned that you can only get help if you pull him up yourself. This understanding is too narrow. One person's help is help, but two people carried him on the stretcher, didn't they? Just like a person falling into a river, is it only saved by swimming, not by sailing? Here, our debater's understanding is comprehensive and accurate.
The second logical mistake is that the understanding of time and space is biased. If you don't help now, won't you help later? Just like a child, she didn't give birth for a while, but she gave birth at last. Can you say that she has a nice voice? Our debater is better at understanding this problem.
The third logical mistake is the judgment of the word stranger. First of all, we are all descendants of the Chinese people. All China people are family. It is that sentence that all countries are brothers and heaven is still our neighbor. We are all brothers and sisters from all corners of the country. Why do people you don't know have to be sentenced to death as soon as they come up? Excuse me, friends and classmates around you, which one is not transformed from the original stranger? There is also an old saying: no fight, no acquaintance. Dare you say that you will refuse to talk to all strangers in the future? As can be seen from the discussion just now, our debater is a descendant of the dragon, with high vision and broad mind.
The fourth logical error, the other debater said there was a fake person. Then ask China ... >>
Question 3: Ideological comments on whether the elderly can get up after falling. Events in which the elderly can't help themselves when they fall down often happen around us. Why did the public turn a blind eye to the fallen old man and refuse to help him? There are deep moral reasons in this. No one helped the old man fall down, which is related to the old man falling down. Some old people who have been helped up have low moral standards. In the previous cheating incidents, unscrupulous old people used people's sympathy and kindness to seek benefits, which made good people really afraid to help the fallen old people. An old man riding a tricycle was injured on an overpass in Rugao, Jiangsu. Yin Hongbin, the bus driver, went down to help the old man, but the old man insisted that he was knocked down by his bus. Fortunately, the police seized the surveillance video, and the matter came out. Sun Xiao, a young man from Hubei who works in Shanghai, kindly sent an old man who was knocked down by a motorcycle to the hospital, but when his family appeared, Sun Xiao was accused by the old man as the perpetrator. The family said that if no witness could be found to prove Sun Xiao's innocence, he would take full responsibility for the matter. Sun Xiao had no choice but to turn to the attackers for help.
Seeing the 90-year-old man lying next to the bus stop sign, Ms. Liu, riding an electric car, hurried off to help the old man. In order not to be a copy of "Peng Yu", Ms. Liu asked several passers-by to testify for herself when helping the elderly. "Girl, I won't depend on you. You are a good man." After being helped up, the old man was very grateful to Ms. Liu. However, after the old man was taken to the hospital, he changed his mind and said that Ms. Liu had hit him. Fortunately, the family members of the elderly are reasonable, and fortunately, witnesses are willing to testify for Ms. Liu.
The old man who fell without integrity broke the heart of the kind rescuer. It is so difficult to get things done well. If the fallen old people are honest and kind, people will not hesitate to save them.
A 70-year-old man who was picking up rags fell in front of Ms. Feng's bicycle passing by. Ms. Feng, who is responsible for herself, quickly sent the elderly to the hospital for examination and treatment. Unexpectedly, the old man found Ms. Feng's unit the next day, took responsibility for the fall, and returned 400 yuan's medical expenses to Ms. Feng. Ms. Feng was deeply moved by the kindness and honesty of the old man. If all the fallen old people can be as honest and kind as Ms. Feng, I believe everyone will not have scruples.
Dare not help the elderly has now become a serious social problem, and how to solve it is particularly important.
Faced with this serious social and moral problem, it is particularly important to strengthen personal ideological and moral cultivation. Everyone should constantly improve their ideological and moral consciousness. The formation of a good social atmosphere is not natural, it needs education and guidance. When people are confused and don't know if they should reach out to help the fallen old man, if they need to speak on behalf of the public trust, it is not bad to make a mountain out of a molehill by clearly advocating, abandoning, rewarding and punishing.
When facing and dealing with some things, the binding force of morality is very weak. When morality can't regulate a phenomenon and this problem needs to be solved urgently, the intervention of law is also necessary. Timely support from the national legal level can greatly eliminate the moral dilemma of "good people are hard to do" in society. The key point of legislation is to establish the principle of exemption and the rule of proof, that is, the rescuer will not bear legal responsibility for the consequences of the rescue act except for gross negligence. Stick to morality, and the fallen old man is no longer helpless.
Question 4: Can the old man's fall support his point of view? If he is in trouble, he should help him ... of course.
But ... some diseases can't be saved if you fall, such as myocardial infarction ... you should call 120 immediately. Besides, there are too many people cheating now. Take photos to prove your innocence before doing good deeds.
Question 5: Views on whether the elderly will be helped when they fall; The argument about whether the old man will be helped when he falls is afraid of being blackmailed; If they don't help, they are worried that something will happen to the old man. Personally, I think the best way is to report to 1 10 first, because maybe the old man not only fell himself, but also reported to 120, because the old man can't get up, and he is basically injured. Some injuries can't be helped casually, otherwise it will be more serious, and then encourage others to help the old man together, because extortion can't help so many people.
Question 6: What do you think of the incident of "Will the old man help or not?" Key words: "Will the old man help or not?" Ideological and political education; case analysis
First, the background analysis of the "helping the elderly" incident
(A) the development of market economy, people's thinking is diversified. In the market economy environment, social culture and economy have developed rapidly. In this case, great changes have taken place in people's minds. Some people think that traditional and valuable ideas should be publicized and carried forward in the market economy environment, while others think that people should consciously move closer to the development trend of the market economy and change with the changes of the environment. The existence of the event of "helping the elderly fall" is a reflection of this phenomenon. Our long-standing culture has endowed us with excellent virtues such as helping others, respecting the elderly and loving the young. With the rapid development of society, many people will doubt whether we should continue to adhere to these excellent virtues, which is why there is such an unnecessary discussion.
(2) The influence of public opinion is growing. In ancient times, the power of public opinion mainly depended on the influence of interpersonal communication; With the rapid development of modern information, even if it is far away, TV, radio, Internet and other media platforms will present what happened thousands of miles away to the public. There is a certain controversy in the Nanjing Peng Yu case, and there is insufficient evidence in the Peng Yu case. The court ruled that Peng Yu compensated the elderly. The evidence was insufficient. Everyone didn't know the truth, but public opinion tended to think that Peng Yu was wronged. The main influence is the psychological bondage of the Peng Yu case to the people, which makes people feel that doing good is risky, and it is necessary to be cautious to help others. Blurred a basic value, and good people are rewarded. The question here is the truth of the Peng Yu case. Who is really sure that Peng Yu didn't hit the old man? Or is Peng Yu wronged, so we should shake our excellent quality from this single small case?
Second, the cause of the incident of "helping the fallen old man"
(a) The Internet and other media influence the direction of public opinion. A little Peng Yu appeared.
Cases, there are various versions of "spoofing" cases in which the elderly can't help themselves when they fall, most of which are fabricated, and some even express distorted negative thoughts such as "good people don't get what they deserve" in the form of cartoons. In order to attract the public's attention, these hype artificially enlarged some details of the "stealing money" incident of the old man falling from the building, and at the same time made a lot of exaggeration and hype to cater to some dark psychology of the public and deliberately expand the bad influence of the incident. The power of public opinion gives everyone an impression that any old man who falls down may be mistaken and labeled as a bad guy.
(2) Moral decline and lack of sense of justice. The Peng Yu incident is only an isolated phenomenon. Why do people pay so much attention? There are many examples of helping others and touching people. Why do people lose confidence in "helping" the fallen old man because of a small accident? I think it's more because people are mentally lazy. This kind of psychology makes people unwilling to do good deeds, but unwilling to admit that they are lazy, so they put the blame on the environment, because external good deeds are easily framed, so they dare not do good deeds.
(C) The current social security is not perfect. Perhaps some old people's ideas are lucky, everything is two-sided, and "unable to help" is unfounded to some extent. For a long time, China's old-age insurance mainly focuses on urban workers' old-age insurance. The endowment insurance for urban residents was piloted in July this year 1, so the elderly have no units and may face the situation in No Country for Old Men; The same is true of medical insurance, and the high medical expenses are also a major reason why a few elderly people oppose false help to their own people. It is precisely because the elderly are afraid of instability in their future expectations that they seek "opportunities" with security.
Thirdly, the enlightenment of "supporting the elderly" to ideological and political education.
(1) Ideological and political educators should keep pace with the times and constantly enrich themselves. With the development of society, the ideological and political education required by the times is very different from the traditional ideological and political education, which requires ideological and political educators to adapt to the development needs of the times, improve the quality of information collection, master more social trends, and have good information collection and processing capabilities and the ability to deal with unexpected problems. Strengthen the training of ideological and political educators, and provide them with the conditions to master the fashion trends. It is necessary to cultivate a team with a high level of political theory, who is familiar with the laws of ideological and political work, can effectively grasp the social development trends, adapt to the voices from all sectors of society, and can promptly and timely carry out ideological and political education on social ideological loopholes.
(2) Ideological and Political Education ... >>
Question 7: Talk about my own understanding in the light of the argument about whether the old man should be helped when he falls. However, in today's society, in the absence of witness and video evidence, we still need to think twice about helping others, because we can be good people, but we can't guarantee that everyone in society is good people. To tell the truth, the main reason is that there are too many liars, which makes us lose the trust we deserve.
Question 8: Discussion: What do you think of "Do you want to help the elderly"? In fact, China people refused to answer and avoided this question. Personally, I think that we should adhere to moral standards for the old man's fall, and' not helping' is obviously stepping on the bottom line of national moral belief! There is nothing wrong with helping the elderly. The fault lies in people's lack of moral concepts and consciousness. The quality of the people has declined, and material and ideological desires have prevailed. When the most basic behavior, whether the elderly should help or not, is to be treated and discussed as a hot topic in China, aren't we ashamed as China people and descendants of dragons? Should we help the elderly? Should we help the elderly? If we really want to solve it as a real problem, we must help it from the perspective of human nature! Of course, wisdom can't help. Preventing being cheated has become a necessary skill for everyone now (hehe), just as we wear cotton-padded clothes in winter not to keep warm, but to keep out the cold. We will be wary of so-called liars from time to time. Constantly divide the good guys and bad guys into two categories. But please believe and firmly believe that there are always more good people than bad people in this land of China. The purpose of our existence is not to eliminate and expel evil, but to expand good.
Question 9: Today, the teacher asked us to have a debate on whether to help the elderly after falling. I hold this view of helping the elderly. The reason to help the elderly is to have love and care for the elderly. Let everyone know that there should be love in this world, starting from me and starting from everyone.