First of all, in terms of publication form, conference papers are usually published orally at academic conferences or displayed in the form of posters, while general papers are published in academic journals in written form. This means that conference papers pay more attention to communication and interaction, while general papers pay more attention to the systematic and in-depth exposition of research results.
Secondly, judging from the review process, the review process of conference papers is usually stricter and faster than that of general journals. This is because the conference papers need to be submitted and peer-reviewed within a limited time to ensure the smooth progress of the conference. In contrast, the review process of general journal papers may be more complicated and longer, requiring multiple rounds of expert review and revision.
In addition, from the perspective of influence and recognition, popular papers are usually considered to have high academic value and influence. This is because the papers in general journals have undergone strict peer review and editing screening, which can ensure the quality and reliability of their contents. Although conference papers also have certain academic value, their influence and recognition are relatively low due to the limitations of their publication form and evaluation process.
Finally, from the style of writing, conference papers usually pay more attention to conciseness and emphasis, so as to convey the main points of research results to the audience in a short time. In contrast, popular papers pay more attention to logical rigor and full argumentation, thus fully demonstrating the research process and results.
In a word, there are some differences between conference papers and general journals in publishing form, review process, influence and recognition, writing style and so on. Therefore, when choosing the type of published papers, we should weigh and choose according to the specific situation and needs.