First of all, in practice, some students reported to the author that directories, references and even original statements were judged as duplicates by HowNet, but they were marked in red font. In fact, this may be because students chose a fake HowNet duplicate checking system to detect papers, and another possibility is that the above-mentioned related content format of the papers submitted by students is wrong. As mentioned above, the duplicate checking of HowNet is not to detect the contents with correct formats such as catalogs, references and quotations, but to take catalogs as an example, and catalogs should be automatically generated by using the automatic catalog generation function of word. If students do not use automatic catalog generation, they will be judged as duplicates.
Secondly, colleges and universities should choose a regular website before checking duplicate. At present, there is a relatively formal academic misconduct network in China. Otherwise, the papers submitted by students may be sold for the second time, and even affect the computer inspection of the school in the future.
To sum up, consider the contents, contents, references and quotations of the paper cover. Students should delete the above contents before submitting their papers for duplicate checking of HowNet to ensure the accuracy of the duplicate checking results of HowNet. In addition, at present, the duplicate checking of HowNet can only identify articles in the form of word, and students can't delete the picture content in the document when checking the papers, which will not affect the accuracy of the duplicate checking results of HowNet.