Founder 1 Debate Competition says: Hello, judges, guests and other debaters!
Our Chinese textbook says that "modern society is a society full of competition, but it is also a society that needs cooperation more." As a modern person, only by learning to cooperate with others can we achieve greater success. " Competition and cooperation are two forces that constitute the survival and development of life and society, and they exist in social life.
Three heads are better than one. Many people are more intelligent. As long as they are good at cooperation and give full play to the strength of cooperation and the whole, they can find a way to succeed. Successful people are good at cooperation, because no one can be a lonely bird. There is a popular saying in Japan: One China can be a Japanese, but three China people can't be three Japanese. Although this statement means that China people have the ability to compete and succeed alone. In training time, we are also above them. Why do we often lose to Japan and South Korea in some key competitions? One of the important reasons is that they have played a cooperative spirit, at least better than us. Visible, no matter what you do, people who are good at cooperation, with the joint efforts of Qi Xin of both sides, can achieve success.
However, there are many problems in competition, which can easily lead to the deterioration of interpersonal relationships, make people more selfish and narrow-minded, and also make many people feel stressed, at a loss, and even have serious psychological obstacles. Therefore, we believe that cooperation is more important than competition and can make civilization progress. Thank you!
Second, the offensive and defensive stage:
The debate says to you: Judges, opponents and friends: Hello everyone!
Dr. Sun Yat-sen said: "Species take competition as the principle, and human beings take cooperation as the principle. If human beings follow this principle, they will prosper; if they don't, they will perish. " This shows how important cooperation is.
There is a popular saying in the north and south of the Yangtze River: people paddle big boats. You won't forget the 1998 flood! Facts have proved that the victory of this special struggle requires the concerted efforts of all the officers and men fighting floods and Qi Xin, the people of all ethnic groups in China, in order to finally build a Great Wall against floods on the backbone of our nation.
We will never forget when SARS was raging in 2003. It is with the joint efforts of leaders at all levels of the central and local governments and people from all walks of life that we have won the final victory. So all this proves that "cooperation can make civilization progress more than competition".
Due to competition, the relationship is indifferent. You guard against me, I guard against you. On the surface, they are kind, but deep down, they are all struggling. Isn't this all caused by "competition"?
The third debate in the square said to everyone: hello, chairman, judges and other debaters!
The opponent thinks that today's debate is a kind of competition, and the opponent thinks that competition causes unhealthy psychology. The opponents regard competition as the apple of their eye and a panacea, which is completely wrong. Can it be said that only competition can promote the development of social civilization? Excuse me, "it's none of your business, hang up" and "just accept and don't send"; Only emphasize individual competition, and do not care about the development and future of the country. " Where can there be civilized development? So your view that competition is beneficial to the development of civilization is nonsense.
During the Three Kingdoms period, Sun Quan and Liu Bei joined forces against Cao Cao, which laid a solid foundation for the Three Kingdoms. Isn't the birth of Das Kapital the crystallization of the cooperation between Marx and Engels?
Everyone knows Michael Jordan of Chicago Bulls. Maybe many people are crazy about him. Jordan's success is inseparable from the cooperation and assistance of his teammates. Looking back on the past and looking forward to the future, we firmly believe that "cooperation can lead to civilization and progress"!
Third, the stage of free debate:
leave out
End stage:
Argument 4 says to you: Judges and friends!
Just now, the other side's 1 debate repeatedly emphasized the importance of competition, but we should ask the other side's defense friends to clearly realize that there is a lot of cooperation in the process of competition itself, and competition is to promote better cooperation, but there are still many problems in competition, such as competition makes people narrow-minded and selfish, which easily leads to the deterioration of interpersonal relationships.
In reality, the fierce competition makes many people feel great pressure, at a loss, and even have serious psychological obstacles. How can these show that competition has promoted the progress of civilization? Only cooperation can promote the progress of civilization.
First of all, cooperation can promote people's better survival, and society is becoming more and more complicated. Only by working together can we tide over the difficulties.
Secondly, cooperation cultivates talents who are more suitable for the development of modern society than competition, and cultivates good psychological morality such as caring for others, unity and friendship.
Third, cooperation is more conducive to promoting the development of science than competition. Isn't the successful development of China's "Shenzhou 5" spacecraft the result of the cooperation of many scientific researchers?
Fourth, cooperation can promote social stability more than competition. The success in fighting floods, SARS and bird flu is the best example.
Let's join hands to create a more civilized future!
Grasping cooperation is the basis of competition, and the ultimate goal of competition is for better cooperation.
Any competition is based on cooperation. Where does competitiveness come from without cooperation? You can directly ask your opponent's debater if they are the best in this debate in their department. If the answer is yes, you can praise them first, and then ask him if they are so strong today because of the cooperation of their department colleagues and several debaters. I don't believe he dares to say no. You can thank him for supporting your point of view. Cooperation is the basis of competition. Everything is the most important. It is impossible to start from the ground without foundation. So cooperation is higher than competition. If you are asking them if they are competing in the department, and he says they signed up themselves, then you can ask them if they studied together before the game and argue with us now. You said that in the process,
First of all, cooperation is an inevitable requirement for the progress of human society. People are gregarious animals, and social cooperation is the "humanity" to promote social progress, while competition with mutual containment and consumption as the goal of winning is a manifestation of human animality. We have repeatedly stressed that the basic principle of "natural selection, survival of the fittest" is a biological concept, and people are not just people in nature! The sociality of human beings fundamentally determines that if people want to survive and develop on this planet, they must follow the principle of mutual cooperation and development. Only in this way can cooperation in the sense of human development be the most fundamental force to promote social progress. Unity is strength! From a historical point of view, from a historical point of view, it is cooperation that makes mankind bid farewell to primitive society. On the contrary, it is the struggle for land, population and living space that makes the tragedies of bloodshed and slaughter staged again and again; It is the sharing of social resources and the division of labor and cooperation that make the capitalist society create countless value wealth, and it is the yearning for world hegemony and the mutual restraint and boring competition that make the human beings who pursue peace endure the social retrogression of two world wars and the Cold War! Other students study history, I think, but they don't know these truths. Competition, and it must be benign and reasonable competition based on social welfare, only plays a role in promoting efficiency and accelerating social progress to a certain extent. A clever woman can't cook without rice, and cooperation in the fundamental sense is still "skin does not exist." What about the superficial competition?
Second, cooperation is also an inevitable trend of social progress. We believe that from the definition of cooperation, an important symbol of social progress is that the social division of labor is becoming more and more detailed, the enjoyment of social resources is increasing, and social welfare is increasing. The existence of cooperation is the requirement and result of the refinement of social division of labor, and it is also an important basis for further rationalization of social division of labor. Competition, especially vicious and extreme competition without cooperation, is likely to lead to the winner being king, the law of the jungle, annexation, monopoly, centralization and rule. This is contrary to the requirements of economic, political and spiritual civilization advocated by our society today, the globalization of international economy and trade and the multi-level development trend of the international community. The wheel of history is rolling forward, and the other debater must know better than us, which is against the trend of historical development.
Third, competition will inevitably lead to mutual containment and consumption in a certain range, resulting in crowding and waste of limited resources, while cooperation can avoid similar problems to the greatest extent. A few years ago, high-volume and low-quality repeated construction in various parts of the country was not because there was no coordination and cooperation mechanism between regions, and they only pursued formalistic face projects at the expense of local competition. Competition is a double-edged sword. Without a strong cooperative hand, you are likely to get hurt in the end! Haven't we suffered enough from low-level internal competition, consumption, disunity and non-cooperation? In the debate just now, we asked the other debater many times how to solve and improve the mutual containment and consumption caused by competition, as well as the crowding and waste of social resources, but the other debater just didn't give a positive answer.
Fourthly, regarding the theory of "survival of the fittest" brought by competition, so as to optimize the rational allocation of social resources, we think this is indeed the advantage of competition, but this advantage only applies to nature. What we are discussing here today is social progress, which belongs to the category of sociology anthropology and history. The laws of nature about species evolution, selection and even ruthless elimination are not completely applicable to human society. For some endangered and precious species, such as giant pandas, it is difficult to reproduce and continue under the natural conditions of modern society. We can't let them "survive the fittest", let alone people in the process of social development? According to the logic that it is the law of "survival of the fittest" for the progress of human society to strive for the opposite party as a friend, should the nationality of those who cannot occupy certain social resources or will be ruthlessly eliminated by society because of their limited personal ability be "abolished"? According to this competitive theory of social progress, the contribution of China's 800 million farmers, who live at the bottom of the real society and lack competitiveness, to social progress will be wiped out. Isn't it a long time for China to solve the problem of farmers? Respect for civil rights, the establishment and improvement of social democracy and legal system, have not become empty promises? There are also social vulnerable groups facing major survival challenges and even crises. Will they also fall victim to each other's so-called "competition-driven theory"? Is one group eliminated at the expense of another group in exchange for another group's "superiority"? Can society really progress in this fierce competition similar to slaughter? What is warm in such a progressive and developed society? Where is the sensibility? Where is the right to life, where is the equality of life? If this kind of "competition-driven theory of survival of the fittest" is unfortunately established, then I would rather the society does not progress and develop!
Finally, I want to say that while competition promotes social development and progress, it also obliterates some of the most essential things for human survival and development. When we try our best to promote social progress for the sake of competition, have you ever wondered how lonely we will be when we completely win the competition and stop competing and can't cooperate? Marx told us that capitalism is the highest level of human social progress, and capitalism is the resurrection of ancient clans in a progressive society of freedom, equality and fraternity, and it is also a high-level resurrection. As Liu Yun said in Great Harmony, the world is for common interests and great harmony.