In China, to prove a present thing, we just need to say "it has existed since ancient times" in the past, and now we add "it is the same in foreign countries". The examination system in ancient and modern times, at home and abroad, has always been free from suspicion. But the more natural this is, the more doubts are hidden inside. I have read several books on pedagogy, but I can't find any statement that can prove the inevitability of the examination system. I don't know whether I despise proof or I can't prove it. It is said that the reasons for the exam are: first, to understand the students; Second, cultivate a sense of competition; Third, select students.

But to understand students, exams are not the only means, let alone the best means. Listen to the speech and look at the homework, and the teacher will naturally know how to do it. Or the teacher's teaching level is also tested in the exam, which is even more ridiculous. At most, it can test the level of teachers teaching students to earn points. The purpose of education is not to earn points. Such a "test" can only interfere with teachers, but can't motivate teachers to make correct efforts. Of course, the score is an indicator of the level, but it is a very inaccurate indicator with many problems. Now people know this, so why not try to establish a new index, but still insist on using it to defend the examination system?

There are many school activities, not just writing papers, but competition everywhere. Of course, the exam is a kind of competition, and it is the fiercest competition, but learning this kind of thing is different from running. It is oneself, not others, that must be defeated. Under the current scoring system, the high scores are not necessarily high, but complacent, and the low scores are not necessarily low, so they are depressed. The exam question is called "comprehensive reflection", but it is not necessarily. Sometimes students catch up with something, sometimes they don't. There is some luck in it, which seems fair, but it is not. Exams exist for one day, and cheating exists for one day. Even if there is a policeman standing behind every student, it is impossible to disappear. There are many questions about such competition.

When it comes to selection, the first thing people think of is the college entrance examination. How to select freshmen with suitable foundation in colleges and universities is another topic, which involves the issue of fairness, so I don't care here. Talk about primary and secondary schools. We claim that everyone is equal in compulsory education, but it is the third, sixth and ninth, and students and schools are determined by scores. There are even primary school entrance exams now. Although it's just "finding the bottom", I don't understand. A child of six or seven years old is holding a blank sheet of paper. What is his ass? It seems to be a habit to take the exam as the jade method. It seems that if you don't know a student's score, you can't know who he is. Recently, there was a policy that junior high schools were divided according to household registration, and there were no more "key junior high schools". However, in practice, there are still some ghosts. There are still scores at work in the dark, and the exam is not wasted. This bad system can't be abolished. Let's abolish Yang.

In the middle school class, when the test paper is sent back after the test, it is the same as now. Adults who make rules seem to forget the feelings of their school days, or because they are too impressed, they deliberately retaliate and "make you suffer." Those who get high scores are proud of themselves, but other students are like thorns in their backs before reading the scores. Ascend to heaven this week and enter the earth next week. It is said that older students don't take the ranking seriously, even the teachers are not satisfied, and attack them for being "thick-skinned"; However, I don't believe that the reason why it is "careless" is that it is humiliating and forgetting things. I believe that under the torture of this turning point, the sensitive places in the child's heart have become dull, and the places that should not be sensitive have been stimulated again. Now people in the education sector have suggested that we should not rank second. This is a cover-up, pretending not to be second, knowing that it is impossible. Are you kidding yourself?

In recent years, "quality education" has been advocated, but "exam-oriented education" has not been advocated. The results of the implementation are invisible to the discerning eye. Nowadays, middle school teachers are in a dilemma because there is no way to take care of both. It is said that excellent teachers can make the classroom interesting and let students go to college. However, a system can only succeed if it hopes for "excellent" teachers, and the feasibility of this system is self-evident. I attended a class of a famous master of quality education in China and found that there were only a few more flowers, but in my bones, I still heard the clatter of scores.

Commentators may say: there are exams abroad, but the problem is not that big. It can still be improved, but it cannot be abolished. First, "the national conditions are different." The way out for students in China is very narrow. The test pressure of foreign students and foreign education is not equal to that of China students and China education. In China, there is really no reason to cancel primary and secondary school exams, but they should be. So why keep them? Secondly, I believe that the foreign examination system is only a stopgap measure, and there are many problems in it, but I am at home, so I don't care.

Watching and changing is a successful composition! !