Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Several attempts to correct primary school composition: excellent teaching papers
Several attempts to correct primary school composition: excellent teaching papers
Composition correction is a kind of reading, a kind of spiritual communication, a kind of enjoyment and an improvement. Therefore, students' sense of participation can not be ignored. Correction will push students to another frontier of writing, let them learn from each other, learn from each other's strengths and gradually form a strong interest in composition. Therefore, we have made such an attempt in composition correction: that is, students criticize each other mainly, supplemented by teachers' correction.

Then, how should the composition correction be carried out?

The first step is to explain the purpose and significance of mutual approval and mutual revision and stimulate interest.

The second step is to teach methods and teach them to fish.

First of all, we should teach students the symbols of composition correction.

Teaching students the general methods of correcting compositions;

1. Is the format correct?

Correct format, full marks. Incorrect format, penalty points. When changing the composition, write only one comment in format: the format is correct. Approval is given by deduction. If this item is not deducted, this article will be given full marks, and then the name of the reviser will be signed.

2. Whether the roll surface is neat or not

The surface of the roll is neat, with full marks. If the paper surface is irregular, you will lose points. Next time you write your own composition, pay attention to the roll.

3. A few typos

If you find a typo, mark it in the original text, write it in the comment on writing, and then write the orthography at the back. Some careless students can't pick out typos. What should I do? Let's do assembly line homework: each person has to approve four articles, and each article has to go through the hands of four people, namely, A, B, C and D. A has approved six typos, and B finds that this article has seven typos instead of six, so A has to write an explanation of 100 words to explain why this typo is missing. C found that there were eight typos in this article, so students A and B should be held accountable and given instructions of 100 words. If typos are found, every two points will be deducted 1 point, and a maximum of 5 points will be deducted. If it exceeds 10, no points will be deducted, but it should be corrected one by one.

4. There are several ill sentences.

Pick out the sick sentences in a composition, underline all the sick sentences, write down where the disease is, and then write down a few sick sentences in the comment on writing at the back of the article. Subtract 1 point from each sentence, subtract 5 points, and do not subtract any more.

There are several obvious mistakes in punctuation.

Emphasize the use of periods, quotation marks, exclamation points and question marks. If an obvious mistake is found, one point will be deducted, five points will be deducted, and if it exceeds five points, it will not be deducted.

6. See if the center of the article is clear and the key points are prominent.

These two points in composition guidance, concrete examples, tell students what is clear and centralized. Before the students correct it, 7. Look at the material selection of the article.

This comment on writing puts forward three requirements: ① whether to focus on the center. (2) Whether it conforms to the reality of life. ③ Whether it is typical. The most important of these three points is the first one. With the improvement of composition level, the typical requirements of material selection are put forward.

8. Look at the structure of the article

As far as the structure is concerned, we should also write three comments clearly: ① Whether the hierarchical paragraphs are clear. ② Whether the transition is natural. ③ Whether the beginning and the end are coordinated.

9. Look at the expression

Mainly depends on whether it meets the requirements of the article genre. Narrative is mainly narrative, expository is mainly explanation, and argumentative is of course mainly discussion. In addition, it depends on whether it meets the requirements of composition guidance.

10. See if the language is concise, fluent and accurate.

If the language is not concise, repetitive or verbose, points will be deducted as appropriate, and this item will not exceed two points. If the language is not fluent, it does not mean that there are sick sentences, but the cohesion between sentences is not coherent, and the penalty will not exceed two points.

1 1. Write a comment:

Eyebrow evaluation (pertinence, knowledge, interest and accuracy)

Universal recognition (enlightening, concrete and constructive)

Rules (more praise, less criticism)

The third step, the teacher demonstrates the correction. Choose the middle and lower composition and correct words, phrases and sentences with unified correction symbols. Eyebrows are always meticulous, and wonderful sentences are marked with wavy lines. Then print this demonstration marking paper and send it to each student, so that students can overcome the randomness and blindness of marking, help students walk and imitate. Then, choose a medium-level composition to print and distribute to the students, and the whole class will batch one composition in a many-to-one way. This revision can be described as a collective effort. In the process of revision, students can clearly understand what should be affirmed, what needs to be improved, and how to revise, and then change their own articles and make progress in revision and revision, which will help students improve their overall writing level.

Step 4: Students correct.

Adopt one-on-one mutual approval, each person only approves one copy at a time, and the burden is not heavy. The reformers try their best to make careful consultations, and the reformers humbly ask for advice and make careful revisions, which are beneficial to both the reformers and the reformed ones.

Step five, write a postscript.

After checking the composition, return it to the author, who will read it again and think about the changes. If there is any objection, he can discuss the revision with the reviser. Write down your thoughts, inspirations or suggestions for revision. Encourage students to re-create in their spare time according to the revised opinions to improve their writing level.

Step six, the teacher reviews it again.

After the above work is completed, the composition will be handed over to the teacher, who will review the original text (understanding writing), marking papers (mastering mutual marking) and postscript (finding benefits), and prepare to comment on the materials.