Compared with the core journals of Peking University, the requirements of C journals for humanities and social sciences are relatively high, so the publishing difficulty can rank first and second. Recent research shows that the number of articles published in C magazine is gradually decreasing, which is in sharp contrast with the continuous expansion of graduate enrollment and the change of professional title evaluation conditions.
Recently, I summed up some good experiences when I talked with several editing teachers about C magazine writing. In order to write a good article, I would like to share it with you:
First of all, we should make clear the main requirements of the articles in C magazine. C magazine requires you to have an in-depth study of the problem, at the same time make a concrete analysis and rigorous argument, and then draw a clear conclusion. There are strict requirements for the logic and thinking of the article and the structure of the full text. Generally speaking, it is to find the right problem, with clear logic, clear point of view, rigorous discussion and complete structure.
Secondly, the writing steps. The general steps are five steps: article typesetting-article framework-material arrangement-article discussion-proofreading. You can refer to my previous article "Topic Writing Course Recommendation for Education Management Thesis | PPT Sharing".
The next step is writing skills. Here are three main points: point 1 Make your point clearly. This is very important, which not only reflects the contribution of your article, but also reflects your understanding of the problem. Many times, I feel this way. There is a lot of material in the article, but it doesn't prove the problem, but it feels piled up. This situation is because your point of view is not clear and you haven't fully understood the connotation of the material, so you can't make a logical connection. For example, everyone is studying ideological and political education courses. If we realize that the upward value and pursuit of curriculum ideological and political education is the foundation, then it can be an important connection point for developing curriculum ideological and political education in different fields. The second point is to identify the problem and distinguish the difference between objective and subjective problems. If the article wants to talk about objective issues, it should not juxtapose subjective issues. But there is no obvious boundary between the two, and sometimes it is easy to be confused. Generally speaking, objective problems can easily lead to subjective phenomena. For example, the problem of "it is difficult to enter the company, but it is difficult to keep people" is a subjective phenomenon and objectively caused. The third point is that if you can't avoid not talking about your own uncertain views, you can quote others' views, keep the space small, talk less, or change the subject.
Finally, the problem of proofreading. Proofreading should not only eliminate typos and language errors, but also eliminate logical wounds, that is to say, I feel that improper writing or unnatural connection are all logical wounds and need to be scrutinized until there is no doubt about the revision.
What kind of article is most likely to be difficult to define, but from the editor's point of view, two points are very important. First, you are an article that conforms to academic norms, and the content of the article is biased towards academic research rather than practical work. Secondly, a good summary is very important.
I recommend reading Teacher Lao Kaisheng's "Question Consciousness, Academic Consciousness and Method Consciousness in Humanities and Social Sciences Research" about academic research. He summed up three points about academic research: 1. Academic research is paradigm research; 2. Academic research should be creative; 3. Theoretical research should keep a distance from practice. It should be said that it is very in place and can bring good inspiration to everyone's academic research.