According to the publicly disclosed information, after entering the labor room, the woman walked out of the labor room twice because of unbearable pain, and proposed a cesarean section to her family. After he jumped to his death, the hospital and his family held their own words: the hospital said that his family refused to change cesarean section many times; Family members said that the hospital's request for cesarean section was rejected. "The doctor said it was impossible to have a caesarean section at once." Aside from the legal point of view of who is ultimately responsible, should doctors listen to the opinions of mothers or their families when it comes to maternal delivery? The whole jumping incident seems to show sadly that anyone can decide her fate except her mother herself.
With what? Giving birth to a child is a dead end for a woman. Whether it is a natural delivery or a caesarean section, it has its own risks. What's more, before 10 pregnancy, the changes of hormone levels in the body caused various discomforts, especially the pubic separation in the third trimester, which made sleeping and turning over very painful. So every mother is great and selfless. They greet new life with pain and even death. Don't they even have the right to choose which mode of production in the end?
Generally speaking, before delivery, the hospital will ask the family members (husbands) to sign the informed consent form for the operation, that is, after the doctor's explanation, he will fully understand the operation scheme and possible risks, and then agree to the doctor's operation for my family members on the premise of knowing. When there is any substitution decision in the production process, the doctor will also base on the decision of the family (husband). Therefore, some netizens suggested that since family members need to sign, in the next stage of legislation, the maternal parents should be considered as the first signatory and the husband as the second signatory, and the in-laws have no right to decide. Or let the mother make her own decision and personally inform the risk.
After all, at the family level, lineal blood relatives are closer than husband and wife, and it is easier to make decisions from the perspective of motherhood. Once the birth causes an accident, the maternal parents will lose a daughter forever, while the husband will only lose an ex-wife at best. As for the in-laws, is the son worried that no one will marry him? Although the words sound harsh, when the sadness fades as time goes by, it remains the same. In this case, why should the decision-making power of maternal safety be given to "outsiders" rather than maternal parents? Why can't pregnant women follow their own wishes when they are conscious? Since the legislative procedure is determined by people, isn't it good to respect the right of choice of pregnant women more humanely for some operations, such as giving birth to children? When a person suffers the highest pain in the world, he can't control his own destiny, and no one even cares about her demands. That kind of despair is comparable to death!
Wen Gong Tuan, say what you want to hear and write what you want to see. Wechat official account: Wen Gongqun.