I won't choose Wallace again. In fact, compared with KFC and McDonald's, Wallace's biggest advantage is its high cost performance. If you put aside the cost performance, the difference between taste and taste is quite big. And there is a big gap in food safety. KFC is well known, and its food safety control is relatively good, with few problems. Like Wallace, he has many food safety problems. In order to control costs, he did not pay attention to food safety in many aspects, and even used expired ingredients. It will be very bad for customers to know this kind of thing. In recent years, Wallace has also been given another title. Once you eat Wallace, you may become a jet fighter, which is quite terrible. This also reflects from the side that Wallace's food safety problem is worth worrying about. For these reasons, fewer and fewer people choose Wallace, and more people choose Wallace only because of its high cost performance.

On the other hand, whether Wallace or KFC, their food is junk food in essence, which means it tastes delicious, but there is not much nutrition on the whole. This kind of food can be eaten several times occasionally, but not every day, otherwise it will have a very bad effect on the body. In addition, Wallace's reputation and reputation are getting worse and worse, and fewer and fewer people will choose Wallace. If it still maintains a high cost performance and good food safety, it must be very popular, but now Wallace can't do this, and it will naturally have a reputation.

So I won't choose Wallace again. On the one hand, Wallace's food safety has really become a big problem. If you go out to eat, you can't guarantee the most basic food safety, which is still terrible. On the other hand, because Wallace is junk food, it's no good to eat less if you can.