What if? SCI theory? Have a strong argument? Is the argument innovative? Sufficient materials, rigorous argument logic, at the same time? Are you proficient in words? For example, what about his theory? Basically, it can be rated as 10. What if? SCI theory? There is no innovation in the argument, and the argument will only quote the previous one? Are you separated? Quote? The materials you have seen are not tender, the arguments are excessive, and the words that are justified are not so smooth, and you can only get three points at most. There are some innovative theories in this argument, which can only get 9 points at most, and the theories obtained from investigation and experiment can get at least 5 points, and so on. Very few, of course? All of them? Beautiful academic achievements, and there is no scientific research conclusion, absolutely? Most of the scores are between 4 and 10.
Go to SCI? Evaluation is not only to help better locate a good theory? What level of journals should I invest in to make the theory better? Where to? Step, the writer should take it seriously and put forward a perfect theory? This is also the attitude that every researcher should have.