The suspect Huang is 3 1 year-old, from Yibin, Sichuan, and the victim Zhao is the anchor of a live broadcast platform, from Nanchang. The victim Zhao Moumou met Huang during the live broadcast of the platform. Hwang had previously ordered a takeaway for his downline, and Hwang knew the real address of the victim Zhao Moumou.

The procuratorial organ prosecuted the criminal suspect.

After the defendant Huang arrived in Nanchang by plane, he lied that he had ordered a takeaway for the victim. Later, in the process of pretending to be a takeaway, the victim Zhao Moumou was held with a knife prepared in advance and detained in Zhao's residence. During the three days of detention, he raped the victim six times regardless of the fact that the victim was in menstruation, during which he also robbed the victim of 2000 yuan. At present, the procuratorial organs have prosecuted criminal suspects for rape and robbery.

During the victim's detention, the abuser demanded 2000 yuan from the victim. Although the perpetrator's coercive means or detention means overlap with the coercive means of rape, because the perpetrator independently carried out robbery during the rape, the coercive means of robbery can be independently identified. Therefore, the perpetrator constitutes robbery, and there is no repeated evaluation. Therefore, the criminal suspect should be punished according to several crimes of rape and robbery.

When determining theft, we should also consider whether the perpetrator is an aggravated punishment for theft. According to the case, the perpetrator robbed the victim of 2000 yuan, which was carried out on impulse after rape. In other words, he didn't rob the house on purpose, so can the perpetrator be identified as burglary? According to the relevant theory of criminal law, the purpose of the perpetrator's burglary only needs to be illegal, that is, as long as the perpetrator enters the house for the illegal purpose of committing personal or property crimes, even if he temporarily commits robbery after entering the house, it also belongs to burglary here.

Finally, we should consider whether the perpetrator constitutes the crime of illegal detention. According to the relevant circumstances of the case, the perpetrator can detain the victim for three consecutive days, reaching the constitutive requirements of the crime of illegal detention, and can be convicted of the crime of illegal detention. However, the illegal detention of the perpetrator is also a compulsory means of rape, so according to the principle of absorbing felony and misdemeanor, the detention of the perpetrator can only be evaluated by rape.