The result of data analysis is aimed at the arguments (assumptions) at the operational level in the argument tree. The purpose of hypothesis testing at the operational level is not to aim at the assumptions themselves, but to explain the views behind the assumptions, that is, the main arguments in the argument tree.

The conclusion mainly expresses the main argument and the secondary argument supported by the operational argument. In the process of expression, it is necessary to mention all the proven operational arguments. Without the main argument, the result of data analysis loses its value, and without the result of data analysis, the conclusion loses its foundation. The content of the conclusion should correspond to the abstract of the paper, which is the skeleton of the conclusion. On the basis of the abstract, some intermediate results and data can be enriched to form the main body of the conclusion.

Second, the significance

Meaning? Explain the practical and theoretical significance of this study. The research results are obtained through scientific analysis, and this section can write my own subjective judgment on its application scope and value on the basis of the research results. The description of the research background in the introduction is actually the foreshadowing of this section, which only needs to be explained by combining the analysis results. Meaning? .

Meaning? The writing of this section should not be divorced from the results of data analysis, and evaluate the practical and theoretical value of its own research abstractly, such as? It has great theoretical and practical significance and fills the gap. Wait a minute.

Three. suggestion

Finally, the paper puts forward some suggestions on the problems that the author thinks are worth studying in the follow-up work of this study. Recommendations include secondary findings from research. The thesis revolves around the main arguments. However, in the process of argumentation, some interesting discoveries often appear. Due to the limitation of the theme, these findings cannot be discussed in depth in the paper, but they are of research value, and the so-called secondary is only for this study.

Suggestions can also explain the points for attention when applying the results of this study. When a researcher completes a research work, he always hopes that someone can continue to study and popularize its application in order to show its value. The author of this paper is most aware of the strengths and weaknesses of his research work, and should point out the shortcomings of this paper and pay attention to the points in in-depth research and promotion. Like what? Clinical pathway management? In this study, the author explained that this study was only conducted in one hospital, and the data collection time was one year, which required more hospitals and a longer time span for repeated verification. At the same time, it is pointed out that the sample comes from a third-class first-class hospital, and smaller hospitals with weak professional and technical level need further verification.

The above is how to share the conclusion of a graduate thesis. The conclusion is the end of the paper and the starting point of further work in the future, so it is necessary to explain the possibility of this research evolution in the future.