The title is concise and powerful. Try not to appear novel, new and other words. Logically, the purpose of writing scientific articles is to report new progress. If it is not new, there is no need to publish it. From the reviewer's point of view, he will not think that your article is original just because you have written something new, and sometimes it will backfire, making the reviewer feel that you are challenging his experience and IQ, so he will try his best to find something novel in your article. Words like "preliminary research" and "preliminary research" often appear in chinese magazine, which are not suitable for SCI articles.
3. Don't fill in 3. A summary with many figures. Because people are the least sensitive to numbers, abstraction needs clear logical thinking, which must be distinct.
4. Selection of charts. It can be represented as graphically as possible, including various statistical charts. Numbers are more intuitive, and tables are all numbers, which is more difficult to understand. If an article makes the reviewer look "uncomfortable", the result can be imagined. In addition, in recent years, it is advocated to combine charts as much as possible, which is easier to understand. Pictures should also cover enough information, not just one picture, and the more pictures in an article, the better, because pictures take up too many pages.
5 references and citations must be standardized. It is better to use document management software (such as Endnote) for editing, rather than hand-making, which is thankless. For all submitted articles, all references will be searched again and generated by software to ensure that no minor mistakes are made.
6. The spelling of chapter titles must be accurate. We suggest using phrases or sentences instead of words.
7. Avoid long paragraphs. Generally speaking, it is advisable to use 3 to 5 sentences in a paragraph. Don't pile them together in pursuit of the feeling of one go, so that anyone who reads a long page will be worried. Be sure to make the article look concise and refreshing.
8. Charts should not be vague. In the review stage, charts and words are generally separated, which requires charts to have high quality and high enough resolution.
9. Follow the general points of scientific writing. Scientific writing has its own set of rules. Failure to follow the rules can only make reviewers feel that you are a novice or an irregular army, so there is almost no psychological pressure to refuse the manuscript.
10. The format of the article should conform to the rules. Generally speaking, double-spaced throughout, with blank lines between paragraphs, to distinguish between text and reference fonts.
Of course, the success of an article depends on many factors. Good writing may not guarantee employment, but at least it can avoid being rejected prematurely, or the manuscript that should have been changed slightly has been approved as a big change. These are just some subtle differences I have summarized, but these are also the easiest to do. I hope to communicate with you more.