What kind of association or sentiment did the above materials trigger? Please write an argumentative essay or narrative of at least 800 words.
Requirements: (1) must meet the stylistic requirements; (2) the angle is optional, the thinking is self-determined and the topic is self-drawn; (3) Don't deviate from the scope of material content and meaning; (4) Do not copy or copy.
Discuss this topic
First, analyze the meaning of the problem
This is a metaphorical material. When examining questions, we should grasp the important information such as "water will compromise to the earth" and "it will eventually flow eastward and be unstoppable", and extract a set of contradictory concepts: "compromise and persistence (persistence)" (its variants are: "compromise and purpose (direction)" compromise and bottom line "and so on. ) discuss this set of contradictions when writing.
Metaphorical materials should first seek the isomorphism between natural phenomena and life society. From the material point of view, it shows the survival wisdom of water (which is actually a vivid expression of Taoist philosophy of life)-it is necessary to "compromise" and "stick to it", which is a metaphor for human survival. In the conflict between water and soil, the path of water choice is compromise, circuitous and not hard. Then, compromise is undoubtedly a good choice to solve conflicts and differences between people, nations and nations, countries and different religions and cultures.
Here, it is important to define the connotation and extension of the core concept "compromise". The antonyms of "compromise" are "struggle" and "resistance" In the traditional context, "compromise" has a negative color and is often equated with "cowardice" and "surrender". It is considered to have no position, no principle, no backbone, no edges and corners, smooth and homesick. What we advocate is to strive for truth, to confront and attack, and to "rather die than surrender." Compared with the enterprising philosophy of Confucianism, the survival wisdom of Taoism is often ignored, and the softness, harmony, flexibility and tolerance of water are often abandoned by us. However, in modern society, interpersonal communication, national integration, class survival and national harmony often need the spirit of compromise, which is a basic value of modern society. This paper reconstructs the value of the concept of "compromise" and lays the foundation for further discussion.
There is not a simple correspondence between the writing of metaphorical materials and the reality of natural phenomena, life and society. Although "compromise" is a good way to solve disputes and conflicts, its role cannot be exaggerated, and compromise cannot completely eliminate all differences and discord. Therefore, what we have to think about is what are the conditions for compromise to play a positive role-whether the two sides can be equal, inclusive and respectful, whether the purpose is just, and whether a fair and mutually beneficial result can be achieved. ...
If we don't make a concrete condition analysis of "compromise", then the discussion is still one-sided and extreme, and it is easy to fall into the quagmire of vulgar bourgeois philosophy. "The river flows eastward", and the water has paid the price of compromise, but it has reached the goal of flowing eastward into the sea, which is "unstoppable", which is also the "persistence" of water in compromise.
The interpretation of this material may also grasp the contradiction between "water" and "soil". As far as the progress of water is concerned, the earth is a barrier and a besieged city. "Water" is the breakthrough of "soil", and "soil" is the shaping of "water". Compared with life, how to break through in the face of difficulties and setbacks is what people should think about. Whether to adapt to nature, to adapt to the environment like water, or to fight, depends on the specific situation.
Second, the concept of reference.
1. Compromise and persistence
2. Square and round (rigid and flexible)
3. Adhere to harmony
4. Flexibility and adherence to principles
……
The following ideas can also be regarded as consistent with the meaning of the question, but they should be different in value orientation:
Change and persist in the process and result.
Endure a calm moment and take a step back.
You can compromise to achieve your goal.
Third, there are problems.
1. Generally speaking, it is vague and empty. The concrete manifestations are as follows: ① The contradiction between "water" and "soil" was not grasped in the examination, so that the cut-in angle was not clear and the discussion focus was not highlighted (how to evaluate the "compromise" adopted by "water"); ② Lack of necessary definition of the core concept "compromise", especially the subversion and reconstruction of traditional concepts; (3) How to distinguish the core concept "compromise" and lack the consciousness of introducing relevant and relative concepts, which makes the discussion unable to present differences and contradictions.
2. One-sidedness and flatness of the argument. Specific manifestations: ① Full of examples of the same nature, lack of falsification consciousness, such as a large number of timely compromise, flexible and successful examples, no matter how many piles there are, there is no argument; Simple binary thinking, saying that "compromise" means everything is good, without analyzing specific context and conditions, denying sharpness, opposition and debate; (3) Lack of necessary value care and guidance for reality, no room for discussion and insufficient breadth.
3. General topics and biased ideas. For example, talk about "freedom and restraint", "success and difficulties", "marching forward in adversity" and "chasing dreams" ...
4. The topic and the question of entering the topic. For example, the topic is improper, and the material cannot be analyzed reasonably when entering the topic.
5. Narrative can't revolve around a central event, can't show a specific contradiction and conflict in the event, and the way to deal with this contradiction and conflict, and can't combine narrative with discussion.