Song Yu, who is good at describing a person's beauty, describes the beauty of the "master's son" in "The Lotito": "The master's son is one point longer, one point shorter, too white to draw, and too red to draw." The beauty of the master's son is really "just right", more or less. Excellent singers are passionate and self-sustaining. Workers should pay attention to the temperature when making steel, and they should be measured when doing political work. In short, too much is not good, too much is not good, many people know that it is not good or not good enough, too much is too much, too much is too much. In fact, if you overdo it, you will often turn a good thing into a bad thing. If you go too far, you will go to the opposite side. Insomnia is not good, just sleep. However, if you sleep too much, you may become a lazy person and work well, but if you work too hard, it will hinder your health, and those who pay too much attention to your health often cause mental burden. They always suspect that they are sick, and as a result, they will ruin their health. Lenin said, "As long as you take one more small step forward-it looks like a small step in the same direction-truth will become a mistake." This sentence is so profound that someone wrote it here. Not too red, not too long or too short, not too fast or too slow, not too much or too little. Isn't that eclecticism? Confucius said: if you go too far, your statement is very similar to the Confucian doctrine of the mean. I said: eclecticism is not eclecticism. Compromism is to divide something into long and short, fast and slow, more and less according to one's own subjectivity. What I think is "just right" is actually subjective. When I say "just right", I don't mean the mean, but the mean. We often say that things should be properly divided, which means standards. Confucius thinks that "fen" is different from us. Marxists have their own standards for "transcendence" and "insufficiency", which are the standards of objective practice. This objective standard is seeking truth from facts, that is, proceeding from reality, doing things according to the laws of things themselves, and finding this objective standard through the test of practice. But also be good at summing up experience in practical actions. Only in this way can we accurately judge what is "excessive" and what is "insufficient" and make our work "just right". 1. What is the main point of this article? 2. What are the advantages of starting with the owner's son? In paragraph 4, the author discusses "too much" and "insufficient", focusing on _ _ _, because ___4. The author first distinguished _ _ and _ _ in answering some people's questions, then clarified _ _, and finally told people __.5. Which paragraph do you think is more suitable for doing ③? Material .............: Why?
Answer 1
1. Whatever you do, it needs to be just right. To be just right, we must seek truth from facts and proceed from reality.
2. The text leads to arguments with the help of stories, which is lively and interesting. Argumentative essays are based on facts and reasons. The author extracts a proposition with universal significance from the well-known story of "the son of the master" in "The Lotito" and puts forward a central argument. This is vivid and interesting, which can attract readers and enhance the readability of the article.
3. "End". This is determined by the actual social situation. Due to the long-term influence of the "Left" political and ideological line, many people have the wrong ideas of "just overdoing it" and "just overdoing it", which is dangerous.
Great harm, so the article focuses on the harm of "Guo". This writing not only proves the central argument from the opposite side, but also has pertinence, which enhances the persuasiveness of the article.
4. "eclecticism" and "golden mean". The right point of view, no matter what you do, needs to be just right. Draw a clear line and clarify people's vague understanding. There is an essential difference between "just right" and "the golden mean" advocated here, which is not based on subjective imagination, but on seeking truth from facts, thus further revealing the connotation of "just right" and more effectively demonstrating the central argument. (2) Because the correct meaning of "just right" is determined, the problem of "how to be just right" is solved.
5. From the perspective of Li Shizhen's discovery that croton can not only cause diarrhea, but also treat chronic diarrhea as long as the dosage is moderate, the following understandings can be drawn: everything should be measured properly; From the perspective of Li Shizhen's discovery through "trial and error", we can draw a conclusion that everything should be just right, proceed from reality and stand the test of practice. The above two understandings are two different angles of the same problem.
Answer 2
1. The author's original intention is to tell people that everything should be "just right". So, first of all, we must be clear about "what is just right"? This is a theoretical problem. If we use reason to say theory, it will take a lot of pen and ink. Even if we make it clear, the average reader will find it boring. If you use images, it will be much better, which can not only make the truth clear, but also make the article vivid.
The key here is to quote correctly and accurately. In order to explain "just right", the author quoted a description of "the master's son", which can be said to be "just right".
We usually call this kind of writing "gossiping". First of all, it gives people a sense of leisure and fun, and benefits from relaxation.