1. When did the topic come, which department approved the project (optional), and when did it start?

2. What is the main task of this research? Whether the "task" has changed (deepened or adjusted) during the whole research process; What changes have led to the renaming of the project name (in this case, the result name)?

3. In what scope (school, class, student group), what changes have taken place in the whole research process.

4. The whole research can be roughly divided into several stages, including whether there is a particularly important key stage, and where the importance and key performance are.

5. Is there anything special to explain about the research methods?

Second, study the arrangement of power.

1, about the participants:

(1) Main researchers (with or without adjustment) and their division of labor. If possible, try to make clear the academic contribution of the main researchers in the research work;

(2) Participants (list only);

(3) main unit and research unit.

2. About consultants and mentors.

(1) list (name, unit, title, etc. );

(2) Academic work done by consultants and tutors;

(3) If necessary, list the "leading group";

(4) When necessary, special thanks can be given to some units, departments and individuals.

Third, the main research work done by the research group.

1, the situation of theoretical learning, mainly around which problems, through which channels, which theories (or monographs, papers, documents) have been learned. How many people took part in the theoretical study?

2. Sum up experience and discuss the situation.

(1) What are the main problems discussed?

(2) The name of the seminar and the number of participants.

③ Experience summary materials, writing and publication of papers.