In the revision of sci papers, the function of tracking revision should be turned on, so that it is more convenient to compare the real-time and current papers before and after revision, which is not only convenient for us to check, but also saves the time of switching interfaces back and forth.

Sometimes, before the anonymous reviewer asks questions, the editor will synthesize the reviewer's opinions and make a request. This also needs a serious reply, because the editor will test your attitude according to your reply. The reply includes two aspects: one is what changes you have made to show your sincerity. The second is to clarify my attitude and even point out their problems in response to the doubts of the two anonymous judges. When the attitudes of reviewers and authors are different, it is often the editors who make decisions based on their own experience and knowledge.