The main reason for advocating the cancellation of junior college students' thesis or undergraduate thesis is that many people do see the disadvantages of junior college students' thesis and undergraduate thesis, but it is difficult to get rid of them. Cancellation is of course the easiest way. However, opponents of cancellation believe that papers can test learning results. Some people think that this is one-way thinking.

However, a single paper evaluation is obviously not suitable for testing the academic performance of all college students and undergraduates in all colleges and universities, because of different majors, different learning purposes, different training objectives and different needs of employers. Objectively speaking, students' academic performance is diversified. How can you force all students to write papers that have no practical significance?

Nowadays, the college entrance examination is moving towards the construction of multiple admission system, and Tsinghua University has reformed the old system of evaluating doctoral students only by papers. In the new era of building a new academic evaluation system, how can there be a unified evaluation of students of different majors in a paper?

Generally speaking, it is not considered that colleges and universities require all students to write papers. Nowadays, it is necessary for us to change our ideas and hope that colleges and universities can break the shackles of only commenting on articles and cancel the requirements for papers for junior college students and undergraduates. We should adopt multiple evaluation methods, that is, pay attention to students' strengths.