1. Audit time is too long: the audit process may be delayed due to busy auditors or other reasons. The solution to this problem is that the author can take the initiative to contact the journal editor to understand the progress of manuscript review and express his concern about the time of manuscript review. In addition, the author can also choose the option of "expedited review" when submitting a paper to speed up the review process.
2. The reviewer's opinions are unclear or vague: sometimes, the reviewer's opinions may be unclear or vague, which brings confusion to the author. In order to solve this problem, the author can seek help from journal editors and ask them to communicate with reviewers in order to get more clear feedback. In addition, the author can also try to further communicate with the reviewers to clarify their opinions and suggestions.
3. The reviewers disagree: Sometimes, different reviewers may put forward different opinions and suggestions on the paper. In this case, the author needs to carefully analyze the opinions of the reviewers and make a decision according to his own research objectives and data. If necessary, the author can discuss these differences with journal editors and seek their suggestions.
4. Reviewer's query on the method or result: Reviewer can query the method or result of the paper. In this case, the author needs to carefully study the opinions of the reviewers and have further discussions with them. If necessary, the author can carry out additional experiments or analysis to support his conclusion.
5. Reviewer's requirements for language or format: Sometimes, the reviewer may require the language or format of the paper. In order to solve this problem, the author needs to read the opinions of the reviewers carefully and make corrections as required. In addition, the author can also ask colleagues or professional editors to help modify the language and format of the paper.