A man with a baby in his arms in Luoyang was robbed of his seat by a fashionable girl on the bus. In a rage, he secretly photographed the girl who grabbed the seat and posted it on an online forum with the title of "Looking at the worst beauty in Luoyang". (February 20, "Oriental Today")

The girl's behavior should be criticized, but her portrait right should be protected. Not to mention this girl, she is a criminal, and her rights are inviolable except those deprived according to law. In a rage, the man took a photo of the girl and posted it online, which has violated the law. I don't know if this girl saw her exposed photos online, or will use legal weapons to defend her rights.

This man's behavior is also immoral. I support the girl who sued the man who took the photo. Now that the Internet is developed, many people intentionally or unintentionally publish other people's privacy online. If this kind of illegal behavior can't be stopped and corrected in time, it will be a network plague, and it will be difficult for everyone to protect themselves, even the virtuous people, because people can't live without privacy. As long as they have privacy, they may get sunburned. The man's post was titled "Look at the worst beauty in Luoyang" and used insulting language. People just grabbed a seat, how did they become the worst quality? If grabbing seats is the worst quality, are violent criminals and drug addicts poor in quality?

For immoral behavior, we can use public opinion to criticize, but we must adhere to the bottom line of respecting the privacy of others, otherwise we will criticize the immorality of others and do immoral things ourselves. I saw a photo on the Internet the other day. When a young man visited a scenic spot, he sat on a sculpture and took a photo. This is undoubtedly uncivilized behavior and should be criticized. But the poster didn't put a mosaic on his face, which completely exposed his image.

Compared with the girl exposed in Luoyang, the young man sitting in the sculpture is even more unfortunate, because he may not know who exposed himself at all, and he can't sue for compensation. But this is the terrible place, because anyone who exposes others at will can criticize others in the name of maintaining social morality, and that can only be trampled on in the end. This will not only fail to promote social progress, but will cause social panic and undermine social stability.