In our daily study, work or life, we always contact or use composition. According to different genres, composition can be divided into narrative, expository, practical and argumentative. What is the composition you have seen? The following are eight debate essays I collected for you, hoping to help you.

On Friday, our class held a debate about whether reading is beneficial or not. I am so excited.

The debate is ready to begin! The number of positive people is about twice that of negative people. I am a member of the positive army.

Let's get started:

Professor: We think it is beneficial to open books. Because reading can increase our knowledge.

Counterparty: We disagree with this view. If you read some bad books, it will be harmful.

At this time, our team members' confidence was shaken and they chattered: "Yes! What should we do now? " "Finish" ... I used my quick wits:

In our opinion, as a person, we should read more good books, but also understand negative news!

Counterparty: Then it's useless to know, right? Like comics.

At this time, we are distressed and want to find an example of "drawing nutrition" from comics.

Pro: Comics also have good things! I remember a classmate in our class who drew a sentence with red wavy lines in his composition, which was extracted from a cartoon!

Counterparty: After all, there is little knowledge!

Pro: Although not as rich as other books, reading is better than not reading at all, right?

Counterparty: Some people think that people in comics can be resurrected, so they want to give it a try and forget it when they die.

At this time, the other party showed a smug smile and despised us, all staring at their asses, as if they could catch FD20xx empty-handed, but we were not to be outdone:

Pro: This is the problem of self-control! Can a three-year-old child read this kind of book? No, even if a child aged 5-6 knows pinyin, his parents won't show it to him!

Objection: Some people like him, others don't ... (dismissed immediately)

Pro: Why do people who like him show him things that are not suitable for him, and why do people who don't like him buy them for him?

Watching each other's faces turn from sunny to cloudy, our faces turn from cloudy to sunny.

Then the teacher spoke: well, this debate is over, and the positive performance is slightly better than the negative one.

At this time, I realized a truth: what can be argued is a draw, and the key is to see who said it badly.

Thus, this wonderful debate ended in the laughter of the positive side and the distress of the negative side.

Today is Sunday. It is rare that I am a lazy cat. But mom woke me up with a lion roar.

After finishing my homework, I picked up the Chinese resource package and read it. When I saw the sentence "Xiang Zhuang dances with a sword, which means Pei Gong", I was puzzled and asked my mother who was washing clothes: "Mom, who is Pei Gong?" Mother said without looking up, "Pei Gong must mean Liu Bei." At this time, the father, known as the encyclopedia at home, came out of the study and said to his mother, "Don't mistake the child for someone else. Pei Gong refers to Liu Bang. " Hearing this, I said to my mother, "Liu Bang and Liu Bei are more than 400 years apart. Will Xiangzhuang really travel through time and space? " Father smiled, mother was angered, and a fierce argument began. They fought, but it was still a tie. They entered the prologue of the second round-looking for arguments. Mom buried herself in a book, and dad looked it up online. After a while, I found my mother was silent. I thought to myself: haha, mom is finished this time. Pei Gong must mean Liu Bang. Look at dad again, smiling all over his face, as if the victory had been decided.

Dad saw that we were silent, so he explained the story: Liu Bang and Xiang Yu met at Hongmen. At the banquet, Fan Zeng, Xiang Yu's counselor, asked Xiang Zhuang to dance the sword and seize the opportunity to kill Liu Bang. Sean, Liu Bang's counselor, said to Fan Kuai: "Today, Xiang Zhuang dances sword, which generally means Pei Gong." Later used to describe the true intention of words and actions.

In the evening, I lay in bed thinking about the scene just now and understood a truth: we should read widely, absorb more knowledge and be a conscientious person.

A debate essay 3 "I support the affirmative." "I support the opposition." Wow, what's wrong with this course? So noisy? Oh, so they are holding a debate!

And I am the leader of the opposition, and Shi Yiyin, the leader of the positive side, began to read his testimony of supporting science and technology. When she read, her voice was loud, and her big eyes were full of confidence, as if she had the determination to win. In her eloquent reading, we pinched a cold sweat for ourselves. It's my turn to read. I secretly made up my mind and vowed to read better and louder than her and let them lose at the starting line first. So, I read aloud, and my heart didn't have a knot. Somehow, as soon as I finished reading, the students who supported us were very excited, and the applause continued until the teacher stopped.

Then the debate began. Team member Fang Haiyan slowly quoted the first evidence. Hearing this, Shi immediately stood up and refuted: "The tail gas emitted by cars contains ……" After the publication, Shi smiled as if celebrating the success of the rebuttal. Then, the square team members put forward the second evidence: "If the medical technology is underdeveloped, what about the patients?" So our Shi Hao stood up with a serious expression, pointed at the players in the square with one hand and said, "I don't agree with your idea. If there is no pollution caused by science and technology, how can people get sick ... "As soon as this question was thrown out, the scene was in chaos, and not only the people above got into a fight, but also the students below argued with it. Both sides were flushed and thirsty. Finally, the teacher asked our team leader to make a summary. As a result, we both began to compare who read better and who spoke more rationally, but in the end it was neck and neck. It is true that the public is right and the old woman is right.

Although we didn't win or lose this debate, we all fought fiercely, and all showed our voluble and generous side. I believe that science and technology are in our human hands, and only by rational utilization can we make it exert greater power.

Today, we held a small debate. That scene is really more intense than a large-scale debate!

The theme of this debate is "Have fun or study hard after class". I agree. We advocate "have fun after class". Before the debate began, my heart was pounding and I was afraid that I would be speechless in the debate.

The host of the debate is an old gentleman. The old teacher announced: "Now, the debate begins!" I'm debating. First of all, I want to say. I quickly stood up, eloquently said some disadvantages of after-school study and advantages of after-school play, and then quickly sat down. On the surface, it looks calm, but in fact, my heart has long been chaotic. Then, it's the opposing side arguing. The opponent stood up confidently and said, "We think we should study after class. Because the class has been going on for 40 minutes, it is necessary to consolidate the class and review it. " Then, there are two positive arguments, two negative arguments and so on. After the three arguments of the opposing side are finished, it is a free debate. The old teacher announced: "Now, the opposing side will speak first." However, no one on the other side stood up and spoke, and all the other students laughed. The old man looked at it and announced, "Now, the positive side will speak first." As soon as the voice fell, I stood up and said, "It's been 40 minutes since class. Of course, we should play and relax after class. " Let the brain relax, otherwise, if the brain is tired, it will cause a series of symptoms. "The opposing party immediately retorted, but they stood up at the same time! That's funny! The free debate is over. The following is the most important final statement. Starting from the opposing side, the opposing side's four arguments stood up, and after only two sentences, they couldn't go on, so the opposing side's two arguments were added. Then it's our turn to argue. The pros and cons talk fluently and confidently about the benefits of playing for a long time after class.

Finally, the old man announced: "The debate won!" "Yes!" Everyone at our party is very happy. Later, I was named "the best debater". I'm really happy. The debate is over, but laughter still echoes in the classroom.

If I have to say the most profound and meaningful activity in my primary school life, I think it must be a debate organized by the class. Although several months have passed, I still remember it clearly.

I remember that week, all of us were discussing the content of the debate arranged by the exchange teacher. On the positive side, it is said that "opening books is beneficial", while on the negative side, it is said that "opening books is not necessarily beneficial".

After grouping, the girls are positive: "Opening books is beneficial"; Boys are the opposite: "opening books is not necessarily beneficial." Both sides selected four students from our class who are excellent in learning, eloquent and quick-thinking.

Under the shouts of the host, the debate officially began. After careful preparation, the pros and cons are like bloodshot cockfights, all rubbing their hands.

First of all, the players in the square talked about the benefits of "opening books is beneficial". They drew inferences and won applause. We suddenly became nervous, but not to be outdone, and listed many examples of "opening books may not be beneficial". In the first round, the other party gave sufficient evidence and reasonable reasons, and got 1 point; In the second round, Zheng Fang quickly pulled back a point through reasonable personnel arrangement and thinking adjustment.

Everyone is like this, you chase after me, and the score is very tight. At this time, the active side suddenly stepped up its offensive and created various traps for the other side, but we did not fall into the trap. We developed strengths and avoided weaknesses, expounded our views from different angles, and finally won the debate by one point in a limited time. I am proud of our opponent's victory, but I also admire the wisdom and efforts of the positive side.

Although the debate ended, it inspired me a lot: I should read more books, accumulate more knowledge, and be calm in the face of counterattack. Only in this way can I win the game.

Early in the morning, the sun is like a new wife who just went out, shyly showing only half her face, shining on green mountains, green waters and fields; There are countless small waves in the stream, like children playing quietly. In this quiet and charming place, who knows that an inspiring debate is going on with the theme of talking about the changes in my hometown?

The first speaker was the main fly on the other side. I saw it shaking its transparent wings, pulling a tie, straightening its clothes, clearing its throat like a leader, wandering for a long time, and finally speaking: Our view is that our hometown has changed and is getting more and more backward. Why? Take us for example! In the past, our home was Qian Qian, and where there were human beings, there were us. In this village, we eat whatever people eat; Any place in the village is our home. But suddenly, the fly took a bite of the straw and his eyes were filled with uncontrollable anger. Now the situation has changed. People starve us, chase us everywhere, ruin my family, and my children are childless. Look at me, my face is thin and yellow. Isn't this all caused by these people? The fly pointed at himself and made a painful expression.

As soon as the voice fell, Fang Xi replied that it was all your own fault. You pass the virus on to people and make them sick. You did a terrible job and pretended to be poor. Are you ashamed? The fly flew away in frustration. Therefore, we believe that our hometown has become more and more progressive. At least, people have learned how to protect themselves. Look at me, how clean and clear I am and how happy my friends are. This is what change has brought me. The stream is sparkling like broken silver, and the sound is like ringing a bell, which is mellow and refreshing.

The garbage on the side didn't say anything, but began to cry first. It sobbed and said, even so, my hometown has become too fast, which hurts me. Before, I was a romantic figure in the village. It is comfortable to wander around. Now, people's rules and regulations make me stay in my cell honestly and lose my personal freedom. You said, life is alive, what's the fun without freedom? Crying and reading poetry. I want to be free. I can have both.

The dustbin outside is impatient and says indignantly, you have no conscience. People have built you a home, lest you wander around and be so ungrateful. Isn't it enough to give some families a chance of rebirth and waste utilization? ; The garbage was suddenly speechless.

Finally, as a judge, Mother Earth said seriously: Both members are reasonable, but the result is self-evident. I know it myself. Haven't I become purer, fatter and more beautiful? A breeze blew, and Mother Earth quickly waved her yellow-green coat. Red, white, yellow and blue flowers cheered: Yes, yes, my hometown has become beautiful and colorful!

A Debate Contest Composition 7 In the second class this afternoon, our class held a debate contest. The topic of the debate is "opening books is beneficial", which may be affirmative or negative. Everyone has made full preparations for this debate. As an opponent, I have also looked up a lot of information to prove that "opening books may not be beneficial."

The debate began. First of all, Huang Ziyin said, "I think it is beneficial to open books. Isn't it for us that people invent high technologies such as laptops? " As soon as Huang Ziyin finished speaking, Xu began to refute: "I am against the point of view. If we use high technology to do these things, don't we know our own strength? " Isn't the exam to test what you have learned? "In this way, the two of them played several rounds. Li Rui, an opponent, found that he could not resist Xu's serial attacks gradually, so he stepped forward and said, "I agree that we can all get 100 points with a laptop." "I can't stand their bullying:" If high technology can do such a thing, why don't you sit on the sofa at home and learn computer, or just implant chips in your brain? " Unexpectedly, my words left them speechless.

In the end, the square won. Everyone thinks this debate is very meaningful. In any case, everyone should study hard and learn knowledge well.

A Debate Composition 8 This morning, we remembered a fierce "argument" in the classroom of Class 5 (4). It was a class debate in our class about "Is it beneficial to open books?".

When Mr. Gu gave the order: "The beneficial debate about opening books in Class 5 (4) begins now!" Yao Wang, as a representative of the affirmative, began to gush. After Wang Yaogang finished speaking, Liu Shiyun, one of the representatives of the opposition party, immediately refuted it. After a while, the debate was in full swing.

Everyone said one thing and I said another, and there was an extremely fierce debate. When several students speak well, Mr. Gu will quietly nod to praise or praise that classmate. The leaders of the square are eloquent; The strikers on the other side are also arguing endlessly.

Finally, I published our final summary: "Reading is beneficial."

In the end, we ended the debate with a draw. This debate has exercised our eloquence, our courage and our grace.

;