The basic structure of argumentative writing consists of three parts: introduction, theory and conclusion, and adopts the writing methods of progressive, comparative and total score.

First, progressive.

1, the step-by-step formula means that the latter argument is based on the previous argument, and the relationship between the front and back is gradually promoted and deepened.

2. The order of all levels and paragraphs in the hierarchical structure is intrinsically closely related and cannot be changed at will. The advantage of this layout is that it can reflect the author's rigorous logical thinking ability.

Second, the control type.

1, the contrast formula is to compare and contrast this part of the argument when expounding and demonstrating it. It is the relationship between positive and negative comparison or related comparison of argumentation content.

2. The specific arrangement is to compare two things or meanings positively and negatively, or to compare one thing or meaning with another. Its advantages are clear layout contrast, clear focus and outstanding arguments.

Third, the total score formula

1. Generally speaking, in general-points-points-points-points-points-points-points-points-points-points-points-points-points-points-points-points.

2. At the same time, the sub-statement must be consistent with the general statement in the central theme, and the central argument must be demonstrated from different angles and sides, and it is not allowed to repeat or cross. Of course, in actual writing, according to the needs of argumentation, these three methods are often combined.

Demonstration connotation

1, logical characteristics

The language of argumentative writing must be accurate, vivid, rigorous and targeted.

There should also be a very clear logical relationship between paragraphs, such as total score, contrast, progression and parallelism. Highlight this relationship with the help of turning sentences or related words. For example, yes, yes, although, but, of course, it is true, so it is equal.

Step 2 think

Because argumentation rewards good and punishes evil, and exhorts and guides people, it must be persuasive and have a correct value orientation.

In serious political lessons, we often read rational articles and famous sayings and epigrams, which will improve our ideological quality and our cognitive ability. Especially for our writing, it is of great benefit to the writing of argumentative essays. It will enrich the content of the article, deepen the idea of the article and improve the persuasiveness of the article.

At the same time, we should pay attention to distinguish between central arguments and sub-arguments:

Argumentative writing has only one central argument, and sub-arguments are used to supplement or discuss the central argument.