In the argumentative essays with full marks or high marks in the college entrance examination, most of the arguments are weak and the cited examples are vulgar. Some examples are novel, but they always make me feel like nonsense. Examples, reasoning, comparison, metaphor and quotation are all used, and all kinds of Wen Er models are put on. As a result, Qiancun was still out of reach, which made people look at it and found nothing. As the saying goes, "literature carries the Tao." What avenue can those self-righteous argumentative essays take? I think they are all very big.

There may be some unfounded remarks, and this argumentative essay, as a critical argumentative essay, is obviously weak in argument, but I think reading my Teng Shi is better than reading a hundred so-called perfect compositions.

However, for those words that I criticized the argumentative essays in the college entrance examination just now, I will also find out various examples in the next few days and give them a comment instead of using the "Teng-style comment method". I will give them a comment according to the standard comment method.

There is a phenomenon in these years, that is, the content of the article is not innovative, so it is fiddled with the form of the article. For example, The Death of a Red Rabbit, which was quite popular a few years ago, and The Theory of Mobile Phone, a perfect composition in Beijing this year, were both written in ancient vernacular, and both got full marks. I read these two famous books while I was meditating. After reading it, I was amazed. The foundation of ancient Chinese characters in China is really good. But I think, if the ancient vernacular is not used as the carrier, will the connotation value of these two articles get full marks? In fact, it can be translated into vernacular Chinese, and you will know it when you read it. I'll translate it for you some other time. I won't use "Tengshi translation", but use standard translation methods to translate.

If their connotation is not enough to give them full marks, then giving them full marks is based on their authors' good classical Chinese foundation. I'm surprised that composition is more basic than classical Chinese, so where is the reading problem of classical Chinese? Shall we write all our compositions in ancient vernacular? Candidates in Beijing are launching an "ancient vernacular movement" to advocate old literature and oppose new literature?

Moreover, in order to cope with the composition of the college entrance examination, teachers have exhausted their magic weapon and tried their best. All kinds of classic writing routines and classic demonstration examples, like avalanches, flooded in like broken bamboo. If so, I really don't know what is the significance of the existence of argumentative essays in the college entrance examination. Dozens of seconds of reading have wasted countless candidates' painstaking efforts and sweat. I believe that with this time, it should be no problem to chew a few famous Chinese and foreign books. More importantly, children are imprisoned in urinals at the age when they should speak freely, and there is no cure for the internal injuries suffered by their hearts.

According to the college entrance examination standard, it is already 800 words. It's not nothing to say, it's unqualified. It is not enough but not enough "case", but "case" that conforms to "case" and does not conform to "case"

Land and air

20 13 438+00.6 night grass.