1. Depth and breadth: The preliminary examination mainly focuses on the basic structure and content of the paper, including research methods, data analysis and interpretation of results. However, the review needs more in-depth discussion of the paper, including a more rigorous review of the rationality of research methods, the reliability of data and the interpretation of results.
2. Innovation: The preliminary examination mainly depends on whether the paper has novel research ideas or methods and whether it contributes to the existing knowledge or theory. The review pays more attention to the innovation and originality of the paper, whether there are new discoveries or viewpoints, and whether it can promote the development of the discipline.
3. Logic and coherence: the first trial mainly depends on whether the logic of the paper is clear and whether the discussion is coherent. The review requires a more rigorous review of the logic and coherence of the paper to ensure that the views and arguments of the paper are closely related and there are no logical loopholes.
4. Writing quality: the first trial mainly depends on whether the writing of the paper is standardized and whether the language is clear. However, the second interview needs a more rigorous review of the writing quality of the paper, including mistakes in grammar, spelling and punctuation.
5. Academic value and social impact: The preliminary examination mainly focuses on the academic value of the paper, including the contribution to the discipline and the promotion of the theory. It is necessary to evaluate the social impact of the paper, including its application value and social impact.
Generally speaking, the evaluation criteria for evaluating papers are stricter and more comprehensive than those for preliminary examination, which requires in-depth evaluation and evaluation of all aspects of the papers.