* Records of debates
/info/9 18- 1.htm
Pro: EQ is valuable, but IQ is more expensive.
Counterparty: IQ is valuable, but EQ is more expensive.
** NBA Review: Which is more important, EQ or IQ?
/article/view.asp？ id=58
Speaking of the relationship between IQ and EQ, I believe everyone will be familiar with it. IQ represents a person's intelligence and determines a person's own ability. Emotional quotient (EQ) represents a person's emotional richness or not, which is reflected in various emotional exchanges and determines the relationship between people. Usually IQ and EQ are irreconcilable, and emphasizing one side often means the lack of the other, which is also the reason why university elites can't take care of themselves often. For NBA players, the dispute between IQ and EQ is an important factor that cannot be ignored, which determines the future direction of the parties. IQ refers to a person's ability to learn and understand tactics and basketball techniques. If you choose, you won't get a generous contract. EQ represents the ability to communicate with teammates and coaches, read games and lead teams. Mastering it means that there are really great leaders on the field, which is also the talent that the league has been focusing on cultivating. Which is more important? Let me analyze it for you.
People with high IQ have excellent personal skills and great use value. The most intuitive statement is that they are the core of the team. With their existence, there is a basic hope of winning. This kind of talents are mainly high school students, such as Kobe, McGrady, Garnett, James and others. Without exception, they all have excellent personal abilities and are indispensable core figures in their respective teams. For these stars, high IQ has enabled them to learn superb basketball skills and brought them a core position and generous contracts. But behind the seemingly enviable scenery, there are unknown hardships.
McGrady was suppressed by his cousin Carter in the second year of the league. Before leaving the Raptors in 2000, McGrady had no chance to surpass Carter, and finally chose Orlando to open up his own world. Then in Orlando, as the captain, he suffered a humiliating losing streak of 19 in 2003-04. At that time, the magic was like sand, but the young McGrady did not turn the team into a strong team, and finally fled this sad place in the form of a transaction. When the Rockets had a poor record this season, McGrady was accused of failing to take the leadership responsibility, especially yesterday's defeat against the Timberwolves, which was attributed to McGrady's unreasonable one-on-one hit ..... Too many things filled McGrady's eyes with confusion, and he didn't know what he had done wrong.
* * * Scientific proof-people with high emotional intelligence are more likely to succeed than people with high IQ.
/article/view.asp？ id=58
Enlightenment from psychological experiments: children with endurance are more likely to succeed.
In 1960s, American psychologist Walter Migard once gave some 4-year-old children a very delicious chocolate candy and told them that they could eat candy. If they eat right away, they can only eat one. If you wait 20 minutes, you can eat two. Some children can't wait to eat candy at once. Other children can wait for 20 minutes, which is endless for them. In order not to lose their temper, they close their eyes and don't look at candy, or put their heads on their arms, talk to themselves, sing, and some even fall asleep. Finally, they ate two sweets.
Alexandra Inna Zhukova, director of the Russian Center for Psychogenetics and Psychoanalysis, said that the last child is good. When I grow up, I am particularly easy to get along with in school, good at communication, alert, innovative, reliable and confident. And those impatient children often become lonely and fragile. Generally speaking, they are more prone to stubborn, indecisive, depressed and other personality manifestations.
But when we talk about outstanding intelligence, many people think of geniuses like Leonardo da Vinci and Einstein. We always think that great people are born, but we don't know why some people's innate talents are constantly improving, while others' talents are suddenly disappearing.
Alexandra Inna Zhukova mentioned the issue of distributing chocolate candy, and thought that it was the most important to restrain temporary interests, which could be said to be the victory of logical thinking over impulsiveness, but EQ did not have a specific arithmetic quotient like IQ. In other words, emotional intelligence (EQ) can't be detected by IQ coefficient.
Some graduates from gold-medal universities may never achieve anything in their lives.
The patent right of the word "EQ" belongs to psychologist Peter Salovey of Yale University and scientist John Myhre of the University of New Hampshire, and the person who abbreviated it as EQ and introduced this new concept into the scientific dictionary is Dr. Daniel Goldman, a psychologist.
According to Goldman, the coefficient of EQ development is composed of a person's firm purpose, ability to know how he and others feel, self-motivation, ability to share joys and sorrows with others, help others, and ability to control himself well in interpersonal communication. People who are good at controlling these emotions have an advantage in front of others. No matter in private life, or in society and politics, there are no exceptions. For example, Goldman Sachs said that he had a friend who, despite his high IQ, was always absent from school and did nothing all day. He managed to graduate from college, but he still couldn't find a job. From this example, Goldman Sachs firmly believes that cleverness itself does not mean success in life. Gold medalists in middle schools sometimes become mediocre college students, and some graduates of gold medal universities may not be able to achieve something in life. There is such a problem: the knowledge learned in college has nothing to do with the difficulties in real life, while the whole education system only pays attention to the acquisition of theoretical knowledge, completely ignoring a person's emotional and intellectual development and the accumulation of some qualities. That's why some people with the same intelligence have made great achievements, while others have stood still. People with emotional intelligence will make full use of their talents and education, including developing their intelligence.
According to psychologists, when children are still young, they can try to remedy them. Because the system of adjusting actions according to emotions will not be fully developed until the age of fifteen or sixteen.
Scientists agree that 20% of success is attributed to IQ.
High emotional intelligence does not exclude people with high IQ, but also people with high IQ. Now scientists are studying how their coefficients complement each other. For example, under extremely abnormal circumstances, how to control your repressed emotions and concentrate? Scientists agree that 20% of success is attributed to IQ, and the rest depends on the nervous system that has been developed and perfected for millions of years.
Alexandra zhukov believes that primitive emotional response is a necessary condition for survival. Fear increases the blood supply to muscles, making them more conducive to running. Surprise forces eyebrows to be raised, and as a result, our eyes are widened, which makes us broaden our horizons and collect more information. I hate to contract facial muscles and block my nostrils so that we can't smell the bad smell.
All primitive feelings come from this part of the brain called the limbic system. Millions of years ago, this system added a new cerebral cortex-neocortex, which enabled people to plan, learn, remember and feel more subtly. For example, lust comes from the limbic system and love comes from the neocortex. The more connections between the limbic system and neocortex, the richer people's feelings will be. Aristotle, an ancient Greek philosopher and scientist, realized this connection. He once wrote in his works: "Everyone is prone to show anger. However, it is not so simple to disclose it to whom, to master the discretion, and to disclose it when and on what occasion. "
In Alexandra Inna Zhukova's view, it's time for schools to consider revising the syllabus and examination system, so as to ensure that EQ can be taught in schools, instead of leaving it to young lomonosov to struggle on their own.
The voice of skeptics
It is said that through persistent training, even IQ is expected to improve. Alexei Grigorev, a professor of psychiatry at Russian Health Center, believes that it is dangerous to "train" EQ, because it will lead to a single "correct" emotional response in different situations, such as laughing at a music party, crying at a funeral and listening honestly in class. You can teach them not to cross the line. For example, when they are angry, it is best to just shout instead of resorting to force. But is it a good thing if a person with high emotional intelligence agrees with leadership in everything?