After submitting a work, the editorial department of the journal will notify the author who has signed the copyright agreement by email, and the submission status may be changed to "FormsAwaitingCompletion" or "Submissions Waiting Author's Approval", which can be changed according to different journals. Once completed, the status will return? Go to Submit to Editor's Office or Submit to Process.

Second, review the format of the week.

Within a week, the technical editor will check the format of the paper and call back to revise it if there are any mistakes.

Third, a week that fits the theme.

After technical editing, academic editors probably look at it first. If the article doesn't meet the theme of the journal or the article is really poor, they will reject it directly, but the wording of the rejection letter is usually euphemistic, such as "It doesn't matter, it's just that we are not suitable" and "You are a good person, you will definitely find someone else."

Fourth, there is no specific time for peer review.

In just a few days, a long year, anything is possible. If the editor thinks it's ok, he will select a few colleagues in this field (maybe you don't have them in the submission materials, which are usually anonymous, and you don't know who the reviewers are) and send them for review. After the review, the reviewers will comment on the review results.

Five, sci papers are revised and rejected for about three months.

After accepting the opinions of many critics, editors will comprehensively consider whether the article is directly adopted, modified or rejected. When the deadline needs to be revised, there will be 60 days of e-mail sent to the correspondent, if there is no need to redo a lot of experiments.