The team submitting the paper also knows that if there is no special anti-counterfeiting team to expose their lax attitude, then no one will find their mistakes. They even hold the luck that those teams that specialize in counterfeiting will not stare at their documents. But their wishes came to nothing. This gambling mentality is actually an adventure, and the team that submitted the paper lost. Their imprecise and incorrect academic research attitude not only discredited themselves, but also tarnished the external image of their hospital. I don't know why I became famous in the world.
They are a professional team, and they have more scientific research knowledge than ordinary people. If their attitude is not correct, how can we expect them to give us an accurate research result? When exploring their motives, some people think that their purpose is to save animal resources and simplify the experimental process, and they are accused of meeting the requirements of the judges. This is embarrassing. They don't seem to realize that scientific research results serve the public, not the judges. Although my reviewer's approval is of great help to some awards, it is also an affirmation of my own scientific research achievements, but approval does not necessarily mean winning the prize.
In fact, team behavior can also be regarded as individual behavior. You can't look at the research results of all teams in the hospital with colored glasses just because of individual teams. Teams in top hospitals in China are found to be academically misconduct, which will create a bad atmosphere. The whole academic research society in China is in trouble. Just like a teacher in a class found that the first place in the class cheated in the exam, the teacher would feel sad and embarrassed. Other students will think that since the first place cheated, I can cheat, too. In this incident, we can simply distinguish who should be a teacher and who should be a student.