After a paper is submitted, it usually goes through the process of first draft, review and finalization, but no one knows what this process is like. The review time of journals at different levels is different, especially the core time is the longest, about half a year. It may even be postponed for some reason. The first draft of the manuscript is reviewed by the editor-in-chief of the magazine, then by the experts, then by the editor-in-chief, and finally the paper can be published. In this process, the first draft is a filtering process. Generally, the first draft can be passed without any major problems, and the most important thing is the review by experts and editors. Regardless of the level of regular journals, experts and editors who review manuscripts are well-known in the industry, or experts and scholars are responsible. The first is the experience and education of experts, especially the experience of experts is the most important. Secondly, it is the serious and responsible attitude of experts to peer review. Third, it is the peer review level of experts. Of course, the reviewer's academic qualifications and experience are different, and the review conclusion of a paper will be different. However, different angles of experts' reviewing manuscripts will lead to highly different evaluations of manuscripts. As an expert and scholar in a certain industry, you should have a comprehensive understanding of the academic trends and technical level of your major. The expert review mainly examines the contents of the paper, such as whether the viewpoints of the paper are correct, whether the principles, formulas, derivation processes and conclusions adopted are correct, whether the experimental data are different from foreign literature, and whether the references are up-to-date. To some extent, expert peer review is a correct evaluation of the academic level, technical level, innovation and advancement of the paper.

When reviewing manuscripts, experts must conduct a comprehensive and detailed review of the contents reflected in academic papers, such as arguments, experimental processes, results and discussions, conclusions, etc. Experts should calm down, think seriously and rationally about different academic viewpoints and arguments, give correct and appropriate evaluation to the paper, and never speculate on the academic value of the paper. The specific method is as follows:

1. Political censorship. Politically, it mainly examines eight aspects: national territory and sovereignty; National dignity; Party's principles and policies; Foreign-related issues; Religious issues; Historical issues; Confidentiality issues; Other political issues.

2. Innovative comments. Innovation mainly refers to the new contribution of papers to human knowledge, technology or thought. The analysis methods and approaches are roughly as follows:

3. Source analysis of the paper: With strict approval of fund projects and good financial support, the paper may be more innovative.

4. Author information analysis: The quality of new works by recognized high-level authors may be good, because the research is inherited, and the quality of papers is positively related to the quality of authors.

6. Analysis: Papers with clear and novel topics, complete experimental process and data, fully typical arguments, rigorous arguments and clear conclusions are generally more innovative.

After receiving the author's article and reaching the publishing level, the magazine will issue a notice to use the manuscript. The notice is stamped with the official seal of the magazine, which proves that the article has been approved for publication. After the author goes through the relevant formalities, the magazine will print and publish. The general contents of the draft notice are as follows:

Comrade XX:

Your article "XXXXXXXX" has been hired by our company and will be published in XX.

XX magazine agency

How to check the authenticity of the draft notice?

Avoid receiving supplementary employment notice.

Supplement is a subsidiary periodical issued by regular periodicals outside the rated distribution task, which is useless for professional title evaluation and unacceptable to many units. So after receiving the employment notice, you must check it carefully. Generally, the recruitment notices in the supplements of regular periodicals all have the word "supplement".

Avoid illegal periodicals

Many illegal periodicals often use the Internet as a tool for publication or dissemination.

Get our address and thesis information in other ways, and then send the employment notice by ordinary letter. For this kind of illegal periodicals, we should first understand the periodicals that we originally contributed, and never trust the employment notices of periodicals that we did not contribute.

Pay attention to imitation publishing

Like books, periodicals also have high imitation editions, often changing one or two words, and being deceived if you don't read them carefully. It is generally difficult to distinguish anti-periodicals, and sometimes they can be found in databases such as Wanfang. I can only tell you that we must pay attention to those newly established periodicals to prevent them from being imitated.

Authors of papers published in databases such as VIP, Wanfang, Long Yuan and HowNet all have intellectual property rights. There are more than 400 kinds of paper net self-operated journals and cooperative journals, all of which are included in the database. We look forward to your cooperation.

Publish a paper and choose to be paper net to take you to experience the service! 100% of the recommended publications are official, and illegal publications, special issues, supplements and supplements with suffixes are never recommended. Open the green fast track (some periodicals can be expedited), 1-3 days to review manuscripts quickly, 1-3 months to read periodicals quickly!