1, the structure of the full text is basically reasonable and scientific, the logical thinking is clear, the viewpoint is expressed accurately, the language is fluent, the argumentation method is reasonable, the references meet the theme requirements, the theme and content meet the professional requirements, and some parts are closely connected with sub-parts, but individual quotations are not marked, and there are not many truly innovative contents, and some concepts are vague, which generally meet the requirements of graduation thesis.
2. The student has a strong ability to consult documents and materials, can comprehensively collect information about the examination system, can comprehensively use the knowledge of the examination system in the writing process, comprehensively analyze the problems existing in the examination system, and has a strong ability to comprehensively use knowledge.
3. The structure of the paper is complete, and each part basically conforms to XXXXX's writing standard. The title of the paper is very good and creative. In order to write this paper well, the author has done some research, especially Steinbeck's original work. It is not difficult to see from the author's reference to the original work that the author is quite familiar with the content of the original work. The language is also very sharp, and the paper is clear-headed, well-founded, with unique views, which has certain reference value and can be regarded as a good article.
4. The topic of the thesis is in line with the professional training objectives, and can basically achieve the comprehensive training objectives, with less difficulty and less workload. The theme of the paper is general. Students' ability to consult documents is poor, and they can't collect information about the examination system comprehensively. In the process of writing, his ability to comprehensively apply the knowledge of examination system and comprehensively analyze the problems of examination system is poor.
The length of the article meets the requirements of the college, the content is not complete enough, the hierarchical structure is problematic, the main points are not prominent enough, the logic is poor, and there is no personal opinion. The title of the article is biased, the argument is not prominent enough, and the discussion can't stick to the theme. The language expression is poor and the format meets the requirements of the specification; Less possession data and poor timeliness; Some contents are similar to others' achievements.
5. The topic of the paper conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. The topic is difficult and the workload is heavy. The topic selection has high academic research (reference) value (great practical guiding significance). The student has a strong ability to consult documents and materials, and can comprehensively collect information about the examination system. In the process of writing, I can comprehensively apply the knowledge of the examination system and comprehensively analyze the problems existing in the examination system, and I have a strong ability to comprehensively apply knowledge.
The length of the article fully conforms to the requirements of the college, with complete content, scientific hierarchical structure, prominent points, clear logical relationship and certain personal opinions. The topics are completely consistent, the arguments are prominent, and the discussion is closely related to the theme. The language expression is fluent, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification; Rich references and strong timeliness; There is no plagiarism.