It shows that generally speaking, the specific situation that women face when committing crimes is much worse than that of men, and the subjective intention is also much worse than that of men.
In this paper, the definitions of misdemeanor, moderate crime and felony in the table are as follows:
"According to the provisions of Article 264 of the Criminal Law of People's Republic of China (PRC), the amount of crime is the main sentencing circumstance that constitutes theft, whether the circumstances are serious or particularly serious. In order to eliminate the influence of the amount of crime on the quantitative analysis of social structural factors, based on the statistics of the punishment intensity of different defendants, this paper distinguishes three sentencing circumstances (hereinafter referred to as misdemeanor, moderate crime and felony): large amount, huge amount and particularly huge amount (19).
The paper also pays attention to some factors that will also affect sentencing, such as whether you are an adult or not and whether you are disabled.
However, the author did not mention the "identity" of the criminal in this case at all, such as whether he was a first-time offender, whether he was an accessory, whether he was committed by a gang, whether the criminal was pregnant at that time, whether he had money to return it and so on.
Because these factors are also factors that will affect sentencing. Why does the author consider age, registered permanent residence, etc., instead of these things more related to sentencing? Why doesn't the author make a regression after controlling these factors?
If, I say if, because I don't have the specific information of these more than 1000 cases.
If most of the female criminals here are accomplices and first-time offenders, can the gender factor expressed in this article still be established?