Legal rights and obligations generally come from the explicit provisions of the law, or although the law is uncivilized, it can be deduced from it. Secondly, legal right means that people can do or not do certain behaviors according to law, and they can ask others to do or not do certain behaviors according to law. Legal rights enable people to obtain some legitimate interests or freedoms. Legal obligation includes two kinds: obligation of action and obligation of omission. As an obligation, people must do certain acts according to law. Legal obligations make people bear certain constraints or burdens. Third, the legal rights and obligations are clearly defined. The types and scope of rights and obligations stipulated by law are restricted by social material living conditions, political civilization and cultural development level, and are limited by social affordability. Whether it is the situation or the right. Whether or not to perform obligations should be carried out within the limits of law. Looking at the relationship between legal rights and legal obligations from the history and practice of law, the former represents interests and the latter represents burdens; The former is active and the latter is passive. They are two separate and opposite components and factors in law, and they are two mutually exclusive opposites. But at the same time, they are interdependent and interrelated. The existence and development of one party must be conditional on the existence and development of the other party. They are mutual infiltration, mutual tolerance and mutual transformation under certain conditions. The total amount of legal rights and legal obligations is equal. In a society, no matter how the two are distributed, no matter how unbalanced the legal rights and obligations actually enjoyed by each social member are, no matter whether the number of laws stipulating rights and obligations is equal or not, the total amount of legal rights and obligations is always equal or equal. In addition, in the specific legal relationship, the two contain each other and have the same boundary. Generally speaking, both of them have their unique and complementary functions. Legal obligation is more conducive to the establishment of social order with its unique binding mechanism of forcing some positive behaviors and preventing some negative behaviors. Legal rights are more conducive to the realization of human freedom with its unique interest orientation and incentive mechanism. Legal rights and legal obligations constitute a complete judicial system and maintain a harmonious social order. We should learn to apply the law in real life, consciously assume corresponding obligations, legally exercise rights, and create a harmonious living environment for ourselves. Rights are always accompanied by obligations. While enjoying rights, every citizen also undertakes obligations. In group life, the most important thing is to give consideration to rights and obligations. It is our duty to protect the rights of ourselves and others. Only by learning to cherish your rights and fulfill your obligations can you become a good citizen. The relationship between rights and obligations From the perspective of legal theory, the research and discussion on the relationship between them mainly includes the following points. 1, corresponding relationship in legal relationship. This correspondence means that any legal right has corresponding legal obligations, and the two are interrelated and unified. As Marx pointed out: "Without obligation, there is no right, and without right, there is no obligation." 2. Reciprocity in social life. This is mainly manifested in the fact that the total amount of rights and obligations is roughly the same. If the total amount of rights is greater than the total amount of obligations, some rights are nominal; If the total amount of obligations is greater than the total amount of rights, there is privilege. 3. The functions are complementary. The enjoyment of legal rights helps to actively fulfill legal obligations. In many cases, the debtor will not perform his obligations without claiming rights. Legal obligations are also legal responsibilities, and the actions and omissions required by the obligation norms must be prohibited. If the legal subject can treat his obligations in this way, it will certainly help to realize his rights and establish a good order. 4. Master-slave relationship in value selection. In any kind of legal system, there are both rights and obligations, so that people's social behavior can be adjusted by law. The relationship between legal rights and legal obligations

Legal rights and obligations are an important part of legal relations. Without legal rights and obligations, there is no legal relationship. Legal relationship is the legal relationship of rights and obligations between the subjects of legal relationship. I. Rights and obligations are interdependent. As the content elements of legal relationship, rights and obligations are closely related and inseparable. In legal relations, rights and obligations are interdependent. The existence of obligation is the premise of the existence of right, and the obligee must fulfill the obligation to enjoy the right; Any right must be accompanied by one or more obligations to ensure its realization; The same person is both the subject of rights and the subject of obligations in legal relations. Under certain conditions, the obligee should assume obligations, and the obligor should enjoy rights under certain conditions. In the relationship between rights and obligations, obligations play a leading role, and the fundamental purpose of law is to protect human rights. However, without the support of mandatory norms, rights will exist in name only and laws will become a dead letter. The rationality of obligation determines the rationality of right. If the rationality of the original obligation is lost, or a new reasonable obligation is created, then the existing rights will inevitably change. The realization of rights depends on the performance of obligations, some of which are obtained by others and some of which are obtained by themselves. If you don't fulfill your obligations consciously, you can't get the corresponding rights. Without obligations, rights cease to exist. That is to say, in the contradictory unity of rights and obligations, obligations are in the main aspect and leading position of contradictions, which plays a leading role and determines the existence and realization of rights. Second, rights and obligations are independent of each other. Rights cannot be obligations, and obligations cannot be rights. Confusing the boundary between the two will inevitably lead to legal mistakes. In other words, rights and obligations have their own scope and boundaries. Beyond this limit, it is not protected by law, or even violates the law. Specifically, exceeding authority may constitute "exceeding authority" or "abusing rights", which is illegal. The law also prohibits obligors from doing things beyond the scope of their obligations. Third, rights and obligations correspond under certain conditions. Rights mean the acquisition and realization of interests, and obligations mean the payment and burden of interests; The state of obtaining or paying benefits between different social subjects established by law constitutes that under certain conditions, they can do or not do certain behaviors, or ask others to do or not do certain behaviors. Rights act on people's behavior with its unique interest orientation and incentive mechanism, and obligations act on people's behavior with its unique restraint mechanism and compulsory mechanism, and finally realize the accurate understanding and exercise of different social subjects based on their own rights and obligations.