First, the test site guide analysis

The overall reading of argumentative essays can generally focus on the following contents:

1, accurately grasp the views (central arguments and sub-arguments) of the article (paragraph);

2. Clarify levels and analyze the internal relations among paragraphs, levels and sentences;

3. Multi-angle analysis of arguments and argumentation methods;

4. Distinguish the way of argumentation from the way of refutation;

5. Analyze and discuss ideas and structure, and experience writing;

6. Grasp the key words and sentences, analyze their meanings, emotional colors and functions, and appreciate the rigor and accuracy of the discussion language.

Xiao Zhong inspected the overall reading of argumentative essays, including comprehensive reading, micro-reading, multi-group comprehensive reading and comparative reading. In recent years, the materials of argumentative essays for senior high school entrance examination mostly come from extracurricular activities, which gives students a broader space for thinking, and the types of questions are gradually dominated by expression.

Second, analyze and summarize the argument.

1. What is an argument?

Argument is the author's views and opinions on a certain issue. To discuss a problem is to make the argument clear so that others can understand, persuade and accept it. The argument should be correct, clear and targeted.

To accurately analyze and summarize arguments, we must first clarify two issues: A, arguments and topics. The thesis is the object and scope of the author's discussion; Argument is the author's view on the topic, which should be a clear judgment and a complete sentence in form. Arguments can't be interrogative, can't have only one phrase, and can't use metaphors. B. central argument and sub-argument. Some articles have both core arguments and sub-arguments Remember: an argumentative essay has only one central argument, and sub-arguments are set up to prove, supplement or play a role in the central argument. Sub-argument is the supporting material of the central argument.

2. How to demonstrate argumentative writing?

Common forms are at the beginning of an article (paragraph), at the end of an article (paragraph), or under discussion. If there is a statement that clearly shows the point at the beginning of an article, and there is the same or similar statement at the end of the article, the opening is the argument. In some articles (paragraphs), there are no sentences that clearly indicate opinions, so it is necessary to combine and refine several sub-arguments, while in other articles, the author's opinions penetrate into the arguments and need to be understood and summarized.

Three. An analysis of arguments and arguments

To put forward an argument, there must be arguments, that is, sufficient facts and correct reasons must be cited to prove the correctness of the argument. The facts used as arguments include representative and conclusive examples, historical facts and statistical data. The reasons for using arguments include the correct remarks of revolutionary instructors (including others), correct scientific principles and experimental results. Arguments and arguments are proved and proved.

Argumentative writing is a method to prove an argument with arguments, and it is a logical connection between arguments. Common methods include setting facts (that is, example method), reasoning (including quotation method), setting facts and reasoning. To put it another way, the argumentation methods include positive and negative comparative argumentation, step-by-step in-depth argumentation and metaphorical argumentation. When reading an argumentative paper, we should analyze which arguments are used, read out the argumentation methods used in the paper and how to use them, and also understand the reasons for using these arguments and argumentation methods in the paper.

Fourth, the way of analysis and argumentation, the language of argumentation.

Argumentative writing can generally be divided into two ways: argumentation and refutation. Argumentative writing is to put forward and clarify one's own views and opinions on certain events or problems. Refutation is to comment on certain events or problems and refute one-sided and wrong views and opinions. There are generally three ways to refute one-sided wrong views: directly refute each other's arguments, refute each other's arguments, and refute each other's arguments by refuting each other's arguments.

Although argumentative essays are divided into arguments and refutations, they are interrelated and used alternately. Argumentative essays often have arguments in the middle and arguments in the middle.

How to analyze the thinking mode of argumentative writing and grasp the hierarchical structure? Generally speaking, the paper should be general, divided and summarized. Either ask questions first, then analyze and demonstrate, and finally draw a conclusion. But not all argumentative papers should be like this, and they should be analyzed in detail. Generally speaking, it can be analyzed according to the above structure.

The rigor of argumentative language is reflected in three aspects: accuracy, thoroughness, strong logic and vivid image, which should be carefully understood: ① grasping the key words to analyze and understand the function and accuracy of its words; (2) Analyze rhetorical devices and the use of idioms and allusions to understand the functions of language; ③ Analyze the relationship between sentences and reveal their strict logic.

Fifth, the overall reading of argumentative essays.

The overall reading of argumentative essays can generally be carried out around the following contents: 1, accurately grasp the central argument (that is, the point of view) of the paragraphs in the sub-argument; 2. The level of management is shorter than that of paragraphs, layer by layer, and the internal relationship between sentences; 3. Multi-angle analysis of arguments and argumentation methods; 4. Distinguish between argumentation methods and refutation; 5. Analyze the discussion ideas in the structure and experience writing; 6. Grasp the key words and sentences, analyze their meanings, emotional colors and functions, and realize that the rigor and accuracy of the discussion language may be a bit long, but I hope I can read it patiently for learning.