This leads to the one-sided pursuit of SCI papers by researchers. This imperfection is mainly manifested in not distinguishing the characteristics of different disciplines, using a ruler to measure mathematics, physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy and geology, ignoring the characteristics and development law of each discipline, which makes it easy for any layman who can do simple addition to evaluate the level of any discipline, because as long as the number of papers increases by one, the impact factor of each paper can increase by one.

To sum up, although 10 years, Chinese scientists and technicians have published more and more papers at home and abroad, but there are few high-quality papers. Like most developing countries, there are many imitations and few innovation breakthroughs, especially in the field of basic research, and there are fewer original innovations. The state should vigorously increase the capital investment in basic research, knowing that the innovation of basic research is the source of all innovation.

Impetuous style of study and quick success are the enemies of scientific and technological innovation. When evaluating the academic level of units and individuals, the quality of papers should be given priority to, and quantity should not be valued. In particular, we should advocate the judgment of the intrinsic value of scientific and technological papers. Peer experts evaluate the innovation, scientificity and demonstration of the paper.

The state should vigorously cultivate the scientific research and innovation system, which is a very arduous systematic project. We should completely abandon the scientific research management mode under the planned economy system, apply the laws of market economy to scientific research management, and maximize the allocation of limited resources. Basic research should have a more tolerant and flexible management model. Nobel Prize winners in science are never cultivated by planning.

The state should allocate a certain proportion of funds to train a group of researchers engaged in basic research and support a group of basic research groups and laboratories. Let those researchers who are enterprising, creative and even have strange ideas work tirelessly in the scientific research garden for a long time and adopt the policy of "no reward" and "no action". There are many such examples in the history of science, such as "key support", "top case project", "unrealistic" and unscientific evaluation. Only a relaxed scientific research environment, advanced experimental facilities and extensive academic exchanges can we undertake the Nobel Prize.