2. "Scientists violate the real purpose of scientific research funds and waste taxpayers' money. The research fund is used for scientific research. However, the money was actually used by them to study children's games and to sum up the results with great fanfare. This result is not good for children and science. This is a waste of taxpayers' money. "
3. "Chen Jingrun once proved that 1+ 1=2, Chen Jingrun's proof is meaningless, but the others are the best proofs of Goldbach's conjecture so far. So we should not only know what it is, but also study why, which is the scientific significance. Use your brain before spraying. " 1, "There are certain standards for what kind of projects are worth studying. Simply put, it is whether it has academic value, whether it can be transformed into economic effect and whether it can have social impact. The winning strategy of rock, paper and scissors, even if it can win a hundred battles, can not think of any academic value, economic effect and social influence except that it can make this boy win more candy and get more opportunities to scratch others' noses. "
2. "In fact, this English report is 2 1 page long and contains various mathematical models, which is far more complicated than the' finding 360 students to play games' described in the report. In the midst of a spit, there are also a large number of netizens who' support' researchers. Xinhua reported that the earliest report was less than 400 words, which may have missed netizens.
3. "On the one hand, the public is not interested in exploring common sense, on the other hand, it is the entertainment carnival of text onlookers, which reduces the reasoning space. The simplicity and rudeness of the two aspects blurred the true face of the incident and turned the academic discussion into a tucao conference. "
4. "Even after that, many media have found out the original text of the paper, which proves that this is a serious academic problem and can't eliminate people's doubts or even abuse. Regardless of the value of this report, at least it can be seen that seeking expression rather than demonstration is one of the symptoms of the current social impetuosity. Everyone can express their dissatisfaction with the impetuousness of the scientific community. However, before judging that other people's scientific research is rubbish, why not check whether your speech is scientific? " 1. A professor of Peking University Institute of Mathematical Sciences who did not want to be named believes that if a mathematical model is established, subjective factors such as people's habits and psychology need to be reasonably incorporated into the mathematical model before discussion can be conducted. Judging from the content of the study, the mathematical model established by it does not completely exclude the independent factors of human beings. "Even with this strategy, why is the other party wood? People will also take countermeasures. "
2. Niels Phil, a game theory and human behavior research analyst working in Beijing, said that game theory is a very important research, and the main problem that needs to be broken through is how to judge how cognitive prejudice affects people's decision-making. He believes that although there is no problem with the hypothesis of the study, the study itself has not verified this hypothesis well. "This conclusion is a bit far-fetched, and it is based on unfair and unrealistic judgments."