Members of the defense Committee or experts outside the Committee appraise and write comments on master's and doctoral theses, and one of the contents is to express opinions on the structure of the thesis. A qualified paper needs a reasonable structure. The positive comments are: this paper is reasonable in structure, rigorous in logic and clear in level. Reasonable structure refers to the "clear hierarchy" and "strict logic" of the paper. This requires understanding the general structure of the thesis, focusing on the structure of master's thesis and doctoral thesis.
Introduction, theory and conclusion constitute the main body of the paper; Contents, preface, bibliography and postscript are subsidiary parts. The most important thing, of course, is ontology. A complete paper consists of three parts: introduction, theory and conclusion. No matter whether it is special or not, the so-called special is nothing more than omitting part of it, conclusion or introduction on the basis of the general structure, but in any case, this theory cannot be omitted.
If divided according to importance, introduction and conclusion belong to components, and this theory belongs to the essential part. For example, a person's head and trunk are essential parts, and limbs are components. No arms, even hands and feet, does not affect the existence of human beings, they are still human beings; But without a head and trunk, you can't be a man with four limbs.
The conclusion part of the paper:
Academic papers should have conclusions, which is determined by the regularity of academic research. Academic research is a process from beginning to end. The introduction is the beginning and the conclusion is the end. This conclusion indicates the end of a scientific research. At the same time, a study should have its research results. What research results are finally obtained should be summarized in the conclusion. If there are still unresolved problems, they should also be pointed out in the conclusion.
From the perspective of thesis defense, the thesis should be appraised by experts and written with comments. Members of the National Defense Commission should also read papers and write comments. Considering that a doctoral thesis usually has more than 200 thousand words, or even more than 300 thousand words, it is usually impossible for experts and professors to read it all at once. Always look at a few pages, put it down, look at a few more pages, and put it down again.
After many times, I read it intermittently. The content before the end is vague. Undeniably, some reviewers can't read the whole text because of time, read the introduction, read several chapters, select several chapters, and then write comments.
If there is a conclusion, summarizing the research results of this paper, the author's basic academic views, the theoretical significance and practical value of this research result will be of great help to the evaluator to make an overall evaluation. This is of great significance to whether the thesis can finally pass the defense. Never take it lightly!