Speaking of the topic of "flogging students", subtle changes have actually taken place. In this process, the attitude evolution among teachers, parents and students can not be ignored. In the 1970s, 1980s and even the first half of 1990s, it was natural for teachers to whip students. At that time, teachers would not make high-profile moves, and students who were beaten did not dare to publicize them everywhere. Even if parents know, it's "wash your dirty linen in public" Maybe they will go back and beat the children again. The tutor has his own explanation for corporal punishment, but it is not explicitly stipulated. It's just that everyone takes it for granted that teachers discipline students. When a student is flogged, it must be his fault. If he makes a mistake, he should be punished. I don't know when it started, but parents went out of the campus because their children were whipped and went to school to find fault. Since then, teachers seem to have consciously abandoned the strict discipline plan. The angle of corporal punishment of students has changed. The teachers' view is that the child belongs to others anyway, and I am afraid that few people will be grateful for being punished by corporal punishment. On the contrary, the hand is slightly heavier, and the golden branches and jade leaves go home to complain, and the parents come to the door and become covered with ants. No one denies it, but teachers are more worried that modern children are too smart, if they embellish their parents. Therefore, fewer and fewer teachers are willing to take the responsibility of strict discipline. On the other hand, parents' view of corporal punishment is that being punished for children's mistakes is one of the ways of discipline, but the way should be appropriate. Of course, instructors have their own interpretations, and no one denies that corporal punishment is one of the methods of discipline. The problem is that everyone's standards have no clear boundaries. Parents think it is appropriate, but what is appropriate? How do teachers balance "suitability" and "unsuitability"? Students will naturally swing from side to side when they are punished by corporal punishment. If the whipping direction is out of shape, will the parents accept the explanation? Faced with many troubles, the authorities have re-formulated the standard of flogging and attached many regulations. In this way, once a student is whipped, it is necessary to abide by the regulations and mobilize the masses. However, there are a lot of additional regulations, and I don't know what it will be like to implement them. If you want to report to your parents or invite them to visit you, do teachers and parents think it is too complicated? I'm still not going to do this. To tell the truth, although the views of tutors on corporal punishment in recent years are very different from those in the past, teachers will not be completely punished in private, and parents should still be in the minority. In other words, everyone knows that corporal punishment cannot be completely avoided, but if it is not high-profile, the outside world will not know much. This time, the authorities put things on the table and immediately touched the nerves of many parents. However, what will happen if you follow the rules? There is no need to jump to conclusions. Whether corporal punishment is appropriate is actually a wide-ranging topic. The authorities' focus on "whether corporal punishment should be implemented" has played a role in the tested student discipline at present? Obviously more controversial. It is an acknowledged fact that students are difficult to discipline nowadays, but does corporal punishment really play a deterrent role? Rectifying campus discipline involves many factors. Besides corporal punishment, counseling, moral indoctrination and even teachers setting an example may be the main reasons. The Ministry of Education should discuss the overall situation in depth and communicate with teachers and parents. Now the trend of students' violation of discipline is worsening, which is a long-term evolution, and all parties should bear certain responsibilities. The right medicine, the focus should not be just corporal punishment.