1. The university has a clear four-year goal, excellent achievements in all subjects, many project managers and rich scientific research experience, and has been given papers and even summits. This kind of person basically follows a good tutor in graduate school, and graduation is a big cow in an industry.

2. I didn't have a clear understanding of my major for four years, studied hard, got excellent grades in all subjects, and lacked project experience and scientific research experience. As I am a cs major, I will take cs as an example. Such people have average coding ability, do not understand the cutting-edge technical framework and lack scientific research ability.

The purpose of insurance research is not clear, and the research direction is also chaotic. I want to study as much as I can, and having a postgraduate diploma will definitely have an advantage in later employment. I thought it would be better to send a summit if I could stimulate my research potential at the graduate stage.

This kind of people are excellent, and the only bright spot may be that they have solid professional knowledge and are not as good as their classmates who come out to work directly after graduation in terms of technology and code ability. The students who took the postgraduate entrance examination, after 1 year preparation, have little difference in professional knowledge.

Yes, I am the second kind of person.