1. The length of the article is completely in line with the regulations of the college, the content is basically complete, the hierarchical structure is general, and the main points are logical to some extent, but there is a lack of personal opinions.

2. Students can skillfully and concisely state the main contents of the paper within the specified time, and respond quickly, clearly and accurately when answering questions.

3. Students can explain the main contents of the paper fluently and clearly within the specified time, and can answer questions related to the paper properly. After full discussion, the defense team agreed to evaluate the paper score as "good" according to the quality of the students' papers and their performance in defense.

4. In the process of graduation thesis writing, the student has a correct attitude, rigorous argumentation, standardized thesis writing, a high level of thesis writing, strong ability to analyze and solve problems with theory, calm defense and smooth and accurate answers. Therefore, this student's graduation thesis meets the requirements of professional training objectives, and it is suggested that an undergraduate degree be awarded.

5. After reviewing the thesis, the defense team thinks that the topic of the thesis has research value, and the author has certain ability to read the reference materials, basically completed the contents stipulated in the graduation thesis task book, and was fluent in writing and able to answer the questions correctly. There are still some defects in this paper, such as unreasonable structure, more introduction and discussion. After discussion by the defense team, the defense score is determined to be good.