Philosophy is "the spiritual essence of one's own time" and the "living soul of civilization" of mankind. Philosophy always reflects and reveals various contradictions of the times in different degrees and forms, pays attention to and answers various questions raised by the times, and constantly changes its form with the progress of the times. In the process of understanding philosophy, there will always be philosophical pain and painful philosophy. Philosophy is a process of ideological activity, which is emphasized. So philosophy is different from other disciplines, and the pursuit of truth is more important than truth itself. Philosophy should be understood as a process, not an ultimate theory. In high school textbooks, philosophy is defined as a theoretical and systematic worldview, and even regarded as a form of worldview. In fact, philosophy should not be defined in this way, which does not conform to human reason and reason. Philosophy is not understood by definition, but by acquiring knowledge from the dilemma of philosophy, reflecting on the core issues of philosophical thought, and how to examine the conflict between happiness and pain brought by philosophy itself when thinking about conscience. How did the pain of philosophy come from? But it is inconceivable to think about this issue in the discussion of "the end of philosophy". The pain of philosophy develops into a painful philosophy, which proves that "the end of philosophy" is impossible. A remarkable phenomenon of modern western philosophy is that "the end of philosophy" has become a hot topic. Of course, before this, people kept sending death notices to philosophy, among which Marx was the most thorough. In fact, philosophy is not over. At the same time, Marx thinks that philosophy regards the proletariat as its material weapon, and similarly, the proletariat regards philosophy as its spiritual weapon. It seems that Marx's point of view can make people excited.

If philosophy does not end, then philosophy should be based on pure metaphysical speculation and efforts to rebuild ontology, instead of realizing a practical philosophy and eliminating philosophies without philosophical significance. The development of Kant's philosophy is divided into two stages, namely "pre-critical period" and "critical period". After establishing his own ideological system, he strongly and comprehensively criticized traditional metaphysics. Therefore, metaphysics is actually over, not philosophy.

In the process of thinking, how to make a critical mission and pay attention to a value system. Philosophy requires us to clarify the problem, but philosophy exists in a vague form. Ontologically, there are always difficulties in the existence of various concepts. To rebuild ontology, we must exercise our philosophical mission here and achieve the unity of self and object. In understanding, we should truly and rationally understand the existence essence of the object, and verify the inevitability of real meaning according to the inevitability of the object law. Only in this way can we not exchange the return of inevitability and contingency. Understanding in such a rational way is not only a rational love for nature, but also a correct judgment of self. In the philosophy of dichotomy, it is reasonable to divide thoughts into "thinking" and "thinking" if English words are used to distinguish them. "Thinking" is (concept) and "thinking" is (image). For (idea), it seems to consider an ultimate result, which is probably out of the mission of philosophical criticism. And (image), in Kant's sense, is an intuitive ability even if the object is not present. How to realize (image) the ability to express objects in a derivative way must probably bring the perceptual intuition of existence back to the mind. When (concept) and (image) are unified, then the words of thought realize the way of existence. At the same time, the process of ideological activities has also achieved philosophical significance. When discussing philosophical problems, the sensibility and rationality of thought must be unified without affecting the purity of thought itself, so that philosophy can return to history.

Use a kind of thinking to recognize existence, and use a kind of verification to confirm whether existence is objective. Theoretical cognition is often only a hypothetical inference, and the space of subject consciousness is imagined. For example, assuming that the existence of God is extremely real and unquestionable, it is impossible to think that God does not exist. Of course, this is just a hypothesis. If it is necessary to prove the existence of truth in cognition, then the subject of the movement of things should not be spirit. Thinking and existence, everything that exists can be explained at the level of thinking. In this world, any existence is reasonable, and any phenomenon is causal. However, in terms of time, how to locate time and how to prove the objectivity of time. How to explain time and existence and the influence of time on existence? Time can change the form of existence, and whether existence can affect the speed of time. Some people think that time will stop if everything that exists is in absolute stillness. However, the premise assumption cannot be realized, so the existence of the philosophy of pain is extremely real. In time analysis, we can only make assumptions now. However, what is used to prove existence is reasonable. For things that exist, no matter how many forms they have, they must be based on the essence of * * * *, that is, to make an essential definition of existence with generality. Only on this basis can we study existence and prove that its existence is of reasonable practical significance. Only in this way can a judgment be realized intellectually. On the contrary, any existence has lost its real meaning. In this case, we can't say that the only characteristic of matter is objective reality. Therefore, a principle has certain correctness. It should not be correct only in a certain place and at a certain moment, but should always stand firm.

There are many ways to judge a thing, but what way can we balance the original thing? What kind of verification is needed in the process of exploring the balance method, and this verification will perform its original mission on that occasion. Kant believes that any kind of behavior, if it is correct in itself or the criterion it follows is correct, can only coexist freely with everyone's will according to the common law.

Under the condition of a proposition, the effect of this condition must be expanded and based on completion. These conditions must be used to limit the influence of non-existent hypothetical propositions.

On philosophical issues, we must answer philosophical judgments through experience itself. After everything on Kant's philosophical road, we still need to think about the source of this value. For reference only. . .