First of all, we need to clearly name the specific manifestations of non-standardization. Generally speaking, there may be the following problems in the title of a paper with nonstandard naming: 1. The title is too long or too short; 2. The title contains unnecessary words or symbols; 3. The title does not accurately reflect the content of the paper. In view of these problems, we can take the following measures to deal with them.

In view of the topic is too long or too short, can be adjusted according to the specific situation. For long titles, we can try to extract keywords from them to accurately reflect the content of the paper. For titles that are too short, you can consider adding relevant modifiers to increase the accuracy and expressiveness of the title.

For the case that the title contains unnecessary words or symbols, we can improve the expression effect of the title by deleting or replacing these words or symbols. For example, delete unnecessary words that have no practical significance, or replace unnecessary symbols with more standardized symbols to make the title more concise and clear.

When the title of the paper can't accurately reflect the content of the paper, we can consider using ordinary words to modify it. By using words that can accurately summarize the theme of the paper, readers can understand the content of the paper more intuitively when reading the title, and improve the attractiveness and information content of the title.

In addition to the above specific treatment methods, we can also use the duplicate checking system to evaluate the rationality and uniqueness of the revised title. The duplicate checking system can judge whether the title of the paper is similar to the title in the existing literature by comparing the keywords and phrases in the paper. When using the duplicate checking system, we should pay attention to the sensitivity and accuracy of the system in judging similarity, so as to avoid misjudging reasonable modifications as duplicates.